相似文献
1
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Use of OECD database has led to incorrect conclusions.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
2
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. United States is paying more and getting less.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
3
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Like should be compared with like.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
4
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Price adjustments falsify comparison.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
5
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Kaiser may be model of American success or aberration.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
6
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Working knowledge would have been needed for comparison.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
7
Getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS. Length of stay is not the problem.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 1;324(7349):1332; author reply 1332.
8
Authors' reply to getting more for their dollar: Kaiser v the NHS.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 29;324(7353):1583. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7353.1583.
9
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: bed management in the NHS can be improved easily.
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):582-3; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.582-c.
10
Hospital bed utilisation in the NHS and Kaiser Permanente: debate about Kaiser needs transparency and hard evidence.
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):583; author reply 584. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7439.583-a.
引用本文的文献
1
Moderately premature infants at Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in California are discharged home earlier than their peers in Massachusetts and the United Kingdom.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Jul;91(4):F245-50. doi: 10.1136/adc.2005.075093. Epub 2006 Jan 31.
2
Should the NHS follow the American way?
BMJ. 2005 Dec 3;331(7528):1328-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7528.1328.
Zotero 插件