Suppr超能文献

不同厚度泡沫轮椅坐垫的座椅界面压力:一种有限元建模方法。

Seat-interface pressures on various thicknesses of foam wheelchair cushions: a finite modeling approach.

作者信息

Ragan Robert, Kernozek Thomas W, Bidar Mani, Matheson J W

机构信息

Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jun;83(6):872-5. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32677.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of cushion thickness on subcutaneous pressures during seating by using a finite element modeling approach.

DESIGN

Seat-interface pressure measurements were used in a computational model.

SETTING

Biomechanics laboratory.

PARTICIPANT

A single healthy man (weight, 70 kg).

INTERVENTIONS

Subject sat upright either with or without cushions of various heights. Seat-interface pressures measured by using a sensor mat interfaced to a personal computer sampling at 15 Hz.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Peak seat-interface pressure; finite-element software was used to model the buttock, ischial tuberosity, and seat cushion. Subcutaneous stresses were calculated from the model.

RESULTS

The region of highest subcutaneous stress in the soft tissue was concentrated within 1 or 2 cm of the ischial tuberosity, with the maximum compressive stress inferior to the bottom surface of the ischial tuberosity. The maximum subcutaneous stress, maximum seat-interface pressure, and maximum subcutaneous shear stress each changed with cushion thickness. Subcutaneous pressures decreased with thicker cushions, but almost all of the reduction was obtained with an 8-cm cushion. The amount of subcutaneous shear stress increased slightly for thicker cushions. The maximum subcutaneous stress was greater than the maximum interface pressure but not by a constant factor. Instead, the former was consistently larger by 0.7 to 0.8 N/cm(2).

CONCLUSIONS

Cushion use reduced the maximum subcutaneous stress inferior to the ischial tuberosity. However, increasing the cushion thickness beyond 8 cm was ineffective in further reducing subcutaneous stress. It was also found that seat-interface pressures were a good indicator of the subcutaneous stress reduction in seating.

摘要

目的

采用有限元建模方法研究坐垫厚度对就坐时皮下压力的影响。

设计

在计算模型中使用座椅界面压力测量。

设置

生物力学实验室。

参与者

一名健康男性(体重70千克)。

干预措施

受试者在有或没有不同高度坐垫的情况下直立就坐。使用与个人计算机相连的传感器垫测量座椅界面压力,采样频率为15赫兹。

主要观察指标

峰值座椅界面压力;使用有限元软件对臀部、坐骨结节和座垫进行建模。根据模型计算皮下应力。

结果

软组织中皮下应力最高的区域集中在坐骨结节下方1或2厘米范围内,最大压应力位于坐骨结节底面下方。最大皮下应力、最大座椅界面压力和最大皮下剪应力均随坐垫厚度而变化。坐垫越厚,皮下压力越低,但几乎所有的降低都是通过8厘米厚的坐垫实现的。对于较厚的坐垫,皮下剪应力的增加幅度较小。最大皮下应力大于最大界面压力,但并非恒定倍数。相反,前者始终比后者大0.7至0.8牛/平方厘米。

结论

使用坐垫可降低坐骨结节下方的最大皮下应力。然而,将坐垫厚度增加到8厘米以上对进一步降低皮下应力无效。还发现座椅界面压力是就坐时皮下应力降低的良好指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验