Berglas Steven
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Harv Bus Rev. 2002 Jun;80(6):86-92, 153.
A personal coach to help your most promising executives reach their potential--sounds good, doesn't it? But, according to Steven Berglas, executive coaches can make a bad situation worse. Because of their backgrounds and biases, they ignore psychological problems they don't understand. Companies need to consider psychotherapeutic intervention when the symptoms plaguing an executive are stubborn or severe. Executives with issues that require more than coaching come in many shapes and sizes. Consider Rob Bernstein, an executive vice president of sales at an automotive parts distributor. According to the CEO, Bernstein had just the right touch with clients but caused personnel problems inside the company. The last straw came when Bernstein publicly humiliated a mail clerk who had interrupted a meeting to ask someone to sign for a package. At that point, the CEO assigned Tom Davis to coach Bernstein. Davis, a former corporate lawyer, worked with Bernstein for four years. But Davis only exacerbated the problem by teaching Bernstein techniques for "handling" employees--methods that were condescending at best. While Bernstein appeared to be improving, he was in fact getting worse. Bernstein's real problems went undetected, and when his boss left the company, he was picked as the successor. Soon enough, Bernstein was again in trouble, suspected of embezzlement. This time, the CEO didn't call Davis; instead, he turned to the author, a trained psychotherapist, for help. Berglas soon realized that Bernstein had a serious narcissistic personality disorder and executive coaching could not help him. As that tale and others in the article teach us, executives to be coached should at the very least first receive a psychological evaluation. And company leaders should beware that executive coaches given free rein can end up wreaking personnel havoc.
一位私人教练帮助最有前途的高管发挥他们的潜力——听起来不错,不是吗?但是,根据史蒂文·伯格拉斯的说法,高管教练可能会让糟糕的情况变得更糟。由于他们的背景和偏见,他们会忽视自己不理解的心理问题。当困扰高管的症状顽固或严重时,公司需要考虑心理治疗干预。有问题且需要的不仅仅是教练指导的高管有各种各样的类型。想想汽车零部件分销商的销售执行副总裁罗布·伯恩斯坦。据首席执行官说,伯恩斯坦与客户相处得恰到好处,但在公司内部引发了人事问题。最后一根稻草是伯恩斯坦当众羞辱了一名邮件收发员,当时这名收发员打断会议请人签收一个包裹。在那时,首席执行官指派汤姆·戴维斯去指导伯恩斯坦。戴维斯曾是一名公司律师,他与伯恩斯坦共事了四年。但戴维斯只是通过教伯恩斯坦“管理”员工的技巧——这些方法充其量是屈尊俯就的——使问题更加恶化。虽然伯恩斯坦看起来在进步,但实际上他却变得更糟了。伯恩斯坦的真正问题没有被发现,当他的老板离开公司时,他被选为继任者。很快,伯恩斯坦又陷入了麻烦,被怀疑挪用公款。这次,首席执行官没有打电话给戴维斯;相反,他向本文作者求助,作者是一名训练有素的心理治疗师。伯格拉斯很快意识到伯恩斯坦患有严重的自恋型人格障碍,高管教练对他毫无帮助。正如这个故事以及文章中的其他故事所教给我们的,接受指导的高管至少首先应该接受心理评估。而且公司领导应该小心,对高管教练放任不管最终可能会造成人员混乱。