Jong Willeke M C, Zuurbier Coert J, De Winter Robbert J, Van Den Heuvel Danyel A F, Reitsma Pieter H, Ten Cate Hugo, Ince Can
Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002 May;41(3):28-32.
Near-physiologic hemodynamic conditions for several hours were needed to study cardiovascular physiology in a murine model. We compared two commonly used anesthetic treatments, urethane alpha-chloralose (U-alphaCh; 968 mg U and 65 mg alphaCh/kg) and 2,2,2-tribromoethanol (TBE; 435 mg/kg) and fentanyl fluanisone midazolam (FFM; 3.313 mg fentanyl, 104.8 mg fluanisone, and 52.42 mg midazolam/kg) with respect to mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) for 100 min at similar levels of surgical anesthesia. Assessed every 10 to 15 min, the U-alphaCh+TBE group maintained a significantly (P < 0.001) lower mean MAP (49 4 mmHg) than did the FFM group (78 5 mmHg). Mean HR in the U-alphaCh+TBE group significantly (P < 0.001) increased from 308 34 bpm at the beginning to 477 43 bpm at the end of the experiment. In comparison, the FFM group showed a stable HR of 431 37 bpm. The MAP and HR of the U-alphaCh+TBE group were extremely unstable, with sudden and unpredictable changes in MAP when examined at 1-min intervals. The results of our study show that U-alphaCh+TBE anesthesia should not be used in murine models in which stable, near-physiologic hemodynamics are needed for cardiovascular studies.
在小鼠模型中研究心血管生理学需要数小时接近生理状态的血流动力学条件。我们比较了两种常用的麻醉处理方法,氨基甲酸乙酯α-氯醛糖(U-αCh;968毫克U和65毫克αCh/千克)以及2,2,2-三溴乙醇(TBE;435毫克/千克)和芬太尼氟胺酮咪达唑仑(FFM;3.313毫克芬太尼、104.8毫克氟胺酮和52.42毫克咪达唑仑/千克),在相似的手术麻醉水平下,观察其平均动脉血压(MAP)和心率(HR)100分钟。每10至15分钟评估一次,U-αCh+TBE组的平均MAP(49±4毫米汞柱)显著低于FFM组(78±5毫米汞柱)(P<0.001)。U-αCh+TBE组的平均HR在实验开始时为308±34次/分钟,到实验结束时显著升高至477±43次/分钟(P<0.001)。相比之下,FFM组的HR稳定在431±37次/分钟。U-αCh+TBE组的MAP和HR极不稳定,以1分钟间隔检查时,MAP会突然出现不可预测的变化。我们的研究结果表明,在需要稳定的、接近生理状态血流动力学的小鼠心血管研究模型中,不应使用U-αCh+TBE麻醉。