Rowe Fabiana, Vargas Superti Silvana, Machado Scheibe Rosane, Dias Cícero Gomes
Hospital Mãe de Deus, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 May;43(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00359-0.
Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus is an important worldwide problem. Resistance is verified in strains harboring the mecA gene and laboratory methods used to detect resistance are object of constant investigation. In the present study, 99 clinical isolates of staphylococci (41 S. aureus, 33 S. epidermidis, 12 S. saprophyticus and 13 members of other species) were submitted to different phenotypic methods and conditions. Detection of the mecA gene by PCR was used as the reference method and detected 14/41, 10/33, and 10/25 isolates of S. aureus, S. epidermidis and other species, respectively. Results showed that, for S. aureus and S. epidermidis, agar diffusion, agar dilution, and the E test incubated during 24h at 35 degrees C correctly discriminated mecA positive from mecA negative isolates. For other species, all methods and conditions presented low specificity (ranging from 20% to 66.7%) and, particularly S. saprophyticus, may need molecular methods to correctly assess methicillin resistance.
耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌是一个全球性的重要问题。携带mecA基因的菌株被证实具有耐药性,用于检测耐药性的实验室方法一直是研究的对象。在本研究中,99株临床葡萄球菌分离株(41株金黄色葡萄球菌、33株表皮葡萄球菌、12株腐生葡萄球菌和13株其他菌种)接受了不同的表型方法和条件检测。采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测mecA基因作为参考方法,分别检测出14/41株金黄色葡萄球菌、10/33株表皮葡萄球菌和10/25株其他菌种。结果表明,对于金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌,琼脂扩散法、琼脂稀释法以及在35℃孵育24小时的E试验能够正确区分mecA阳性和mecA阴性分离株。对于其他菌种,所有方法和条件的特异性均较低(范围为20%至66.7%),尤其是腐生葡萄球菌,可能需要分子方法来正确评估甲氧西林耐药性。