Suppr超能文献

中风或短暂性脑缺血发作后,高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病和吸烟的控制情况如何?

How well are hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking managed after a stroke or transient ischemic attack?

作者信息

Mouradian Mikael S, Majumdar Sumit R, Senthilselvan Ambikaipakan, Khan Khurshid, Shuaib Ashfaq

机构信息

Division of Neurology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1656-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000017877.62543.14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke prevention clinics (SPCs) are not usually involved with the active management of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking. The effect of consultations generated at SPCs on the adequacy of the management of these risk factors for stroke has not been well described, and few studies have long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 119 consecutive patients referred to an SPC for secondary prevention. One year after their baseline visit, patients were re-evaluated for the adequacy of the management of the above risk factors, and the proportion of improvement was assessed.

RESULTS

One-hundred twelve patients returned for their 1-year follow-up visit. Sixty-six were male, and the average age was 65 years. Hypertension was present in 83 patients, hyperlipidemia in 92, diabetes in 26, and smoking in 38, and 80 had multiple risk factors. At baseline, 66% of patients with hypertension, 17% of patients with hyperlipidemia, and 23% of diabetics had adequate management of their respective risk factors. During 1 year of follow-up, hypertension management improved 20% (P<0.001) and lipid management improved 32% (P<0.001). There was no significant improvement in diabetes management or smoking cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our understanding of the benefit of addressing hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, and smoking for secondary prevention of stroke is evolving, we found marked room for improvement in the management of these four risk factors. SPCs may need to be more actively involved in the management of these modifiable risk factors, if we are to significantly impact the risk of recurrent stroke.

摘要

背景与目的

卒中预防诊所(SPCs)通常不参与高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病及吸烟的积极管理。SPCs所提供的咨询对这些卒中风险因素管理充分性的影响尚未得到充分描述,且很少有研究进行长期随访。

方法

我们对119例因二级预防转诊至SPCs的连续患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。在基线访视一年后,对患者上述风险因素管理的充分性进行重新评估,并评估改善的比例。

结果

112例患者返回进行1年的随访。其中66例为男性,平均年龄65岁。83例患者患有高血压,92例患有高脂血症,26例患有糖尿病,38例吸烟,80例有多种风险因素。在基线时,66%的高血压患者、17%的高脂血症患者和23%的糖尿病患者对各自的风险因素管理充分。在1年的随访期间,高血压管理改善了20%(P<0.001),血脂管理改善了32%(P<0.001)。糖尿病管理或戒烟方面无显著改善。

结论

尽管我们对控制高血压、高脂血症、糖尿病和吸烟对卒中二级预防益处的理解在不断发展,但我们发现这四种风险因素的管理仍有显著的改善空间。如果我们要显著影响复发性卒中的风险,SPCs可能需要更积极地参与这些可改变风险因素的管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验