Edelman M J, Khanwani S L
University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201-1595, USA.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2001 Feb;2(1):51-62. doi: 10.1007/s11864-001-0016-6.
The treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer requires histologic proof of diagnosis, careful staging, and assessment of each patient's performance status and comorbidities. For patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) and stage IV disease who have a Cancer and Leukemia Group B performance status (PS) of 0 to 1, appropriate management consists of combination chemotherapy with a platinum (either cisplatin or carboplatin) combined with paclitaxel, gemcitabine, vinorelbine, docetaxel, or CPT-11. Dosages and schedules previously established by large phase II or phase III studies should be followed. Variations in the toxicity patterns, schedules of administration, and economic considerations should guide the selection of the specific regimen. For patients who maintain a good performance status after first-line chemotherapy, second-line treatment may be considered. Current evidence supports the use of docetaxel as second-line treatment if the patient has not previously received this drug. Gemcitabine and paclitaxel may also have activity in this setting. Vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and CPT-11 appear to be inactive as second-line therapy for patients who have previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. For patients with a PS of 2, single-agent chemotherapy with vinorelbine, gemcitabine, or a combination of the two should be considered. Patients with poor performance status should be treated with supportive measures designed to relieve pain and acute complications because any tumor-directed therapy has limited benefit. Special situations exist in which curative therapy for metastatic disease is a possibility. Patients who present with solitary sites of metastatic disease, particularly after a long disease-free interval and in the CNS may undergo definitive surgery or radiotherapy with curative intent. Some have also reported favorable outcomes for patients with solitary adrenal or bone metastases as well. Surgical treatment or definitive radiotherapy should not be employed unless a thorough restaging evaluation is performed that includes computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen through adrenals, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography scan. A plethora of new agents targeting angiogenesis, tumor invasiveness, the hypoxic environment of tumors, and the cell cycle are currently in development.
晚期非小细胞肺癌的治疗需要组织学诊断证据、仔细的分期以及对每位患者的体能状态和合并症进行评估。对于ⅢB期(有胸腔积液)和Ⅳ期、癌症和白血病B组体能状态(PS)为0至1的患者,恰当的治疗方案是铂类(顺铂或卡铂)联合紫杉醇、吉西他滨、长春瑞滨、多西他赛或伊立替康进行联合化疗。应遵循先前大型Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期研究确定的剂量和疗程。毒性模式、给药方案的差异以及经济因素应指导具体治疗方案的选择。对于一线化疗后体能状态良好的患者,可考虑二线治疗。目前的证据支持,如果患者先前未接受过多西他赛治疗,可将其用作二线治疗。吉西他滨和紫杉醇在这种情况下也可能有效。对于先前接受过铂类化疗的患者,长春瑞滨、异环磷酰胺和伊立替康作为二线治疗似乎无效。对于PS为2的患者,可考虑采用长春瑞滨、吉西他滨单药化疗或两者联合化疗。体能状态差的患者应采用旨在缓解疼痛和急性并发症的支持性措施进行治疗,因为任何针对肿瘤的治疗获益都有限。在某些特殊情况下,转移性疾病有可能进行根治性治疗。出现孤立转移灶的患者,尤其是在较长无病间期后且转移至中枢神经系统的患者,可进行根治性手术或放疗。也有报道称,孤立肾上腺或骨转移患者也有良好预后。除非进行包括胸部和腹部肾上腺CT扫描、脑磁共振成像以及正电子发射断层扫描在内的全面再分期评估,否则不应采用手术治疗或根治性放疗。目前正在研发大量针对血管生成、肿瘤侵袭、肿瘤缺氧环境和细胞周期的新型药物。