• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The search for value in health care: a review of the National Committee for Quality Assurance efforts.医疗保健领域的价值探寻:对美国国家质量保证委员会工作的综述
J Natl Med Assoc. 2002 May;94(5):344-50.
2
Quality measurement for health systems: accreditation and report cards.卫生系统的质量评估:认证与成绩单
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Jul 1;54(13):1528-35. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/54.13.1528.
3
Janet M. Corrigan, Ph.D.. Interview by Marie E. Sinioris.珍妮特·M·科里根,哲学博士。玛丽·E·西尼奥里斯采访。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1994 Summer;2(4):82-9.
4
National Committee on Quality Assurance health-plan accreditation: predictors, correlates of performance, and market impact.国家质量保证委员会健康计划认证:预测因素、绩效关联因素及市场影响
Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):325-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00008.
5
Accreditation by the National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA): a description.美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)认证:说明
J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999 May;92(5):234-7.
6
Data initiatives: HEDIS and the New England Business Coalition.数据计划:医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)与新英格兰商业联盟
Am J Med Qual. 1996 Spring;11(1):S58-62.
7
Health plans' use of asthma quality improvement projects to meet NCQA accreditation standards.健康计划利用哮喘质量改进项目来满足美国国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)的认证标准。
Am J Manag Care. 2001 Jun;7(6):567-72.
8
Health plan accreditation: NCQA, JCAHO, or both?健康计划认证:国家质量保证委员会(NCQA)、医疗机构评审联合委员会(JCAHO),还是两者兼具?
Manag Care Q. 1998 Autumn;6(4):52-61.
9
Do employers know the quality of health care benefits they provide? Use of HEDIS depression scores for health plans.雇主了解他们提供的医疗保健福利的质量吗?使用 HEDIS 抑郁评分来评估健康计划。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1;64(11):1134-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200534.
10
Quality in managed care: developments and considerations.
Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1997 Jul-Sep;5(3):123-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The implementation of value-based healthcare: a scoping review.基于价值的医疗保健的实施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07489-2.
2
A method for measuring the effect of certified electronic health record technology on childhood immunization status scores among Medicaid managed care network providers.一种测量认证电子健康记录技术对医疗补助管理式医疗网络提供者中儿童免疫状况评分影响的方法。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Oct;110:103567. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103567. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
The changing face of chronic illness management in primary care: a qualitative study of underlying influences and unintended outcomes.基层医疗中慢性病管理模式的变化:一项对潜在影响和意外结果的定性研究。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct;10(5):452-60. doi: 10.1370/afm.1380.

本文引用的文献

1
Accreditation. Why employers don't demand it.
Bus Health. 1999 Jan;17(1):19-22.
2
Medical group practice applications for HEDIS: reality or myth?医疗集团实践在医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)方面的应用:现实还是神话?
Coll Rev. 1997 Spring;14(1):39-60.
3
Use of outcome data by purchasers and consumers: new strategies and new dilemmas.
Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;10(6):503-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.6.503.
4
A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group.两种抗菌浸渍中心静脉导管的比较。导管研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):1-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400101.
5
Assessing managed care for children with chronic conditions.
Health Aff (Millwood). 1998 Jul-Aug;17(4):42-52. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.42.
6
Rolling down the runway: the challenges ahead for quality report cards.
JAMA. 1998 Jun 3;279(21):1691-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.21.1691.
7
Blue skies or black eyes? HEDIS puts not-for-profit plans on top.
Hosp Health Netw. 1998 Apr 20;72(8):26-30.
8
Negotiating the new health system: purchasing publicly accountable managed care.协商新的医疗体系:购买具有公共问责制的管理式医疗服务
Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr;14(3 Suppl):67-71. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(97)00046-9.
9
HEDIS, what is it? What does it mean to me? How does it affect my practice?
Mo Med. 1995 Jul;92(7):330-1.

医疗保健领域的价值探寻:对美国国家质量保证委员会工作的综述

The search for value in health care: a review of the National Committee for Quality Assurance efforts.

作者信息

Ohldin Andrea, Mims Adrienne

机构信息

University of Alabama, Birmingham 35204, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2002 May;94(5):344-50.

PMID:12069214
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2594356/
Abstract

Large employers formed the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) to ensure value to healthcare purchasers. Value in healthcare is a function of quality divided by costs. Through NCQA's role as an accrediting agency for healthcare organizations and the development of performance measures, Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS), gains toward defining the value of health services have materialized. An analysis of the impact of HEDIS data collection on physician practices and the influence of HEDIS data on employer, employee, and governmental health plan selections is examined. This study consisted of a general review, from 1993 to 2001, of HealthStar databases, PubMed databases, and the NCQA website. NCQA accreditation is accepted as an important industry milestone for health plans, credentials verification organizations, and physician organizations. The data for HEDIS is collected from health plan administrative data repositories, whereas health plan members' clinical data may be collected by chart abstraction in physician offices. Data collection in physician offices consumes administrative resources from physician practices and health plans. As commercial and governmental insurers move toward greater adoption of HEDIS measures, complex implications are created for physician practices and vulnerable populations. There are lingering questions regarding the improvements in quality of care for medically underserved populations and physician practice costs attributable to HEDIS.

摘要

大型雇主组建了国家质量保证委员会(NCQA),以确保为医疗保健购买者创造价值。医疗保健中的价值是质量与成本之比的函数。通过NCQA作为医疗保健组织认证机构的角色以及绩效衡量标准——健康计划雇主数据与信息集(HEDIS)的制定,在界定健康服务价值方面已取得了实际成效。本文考察了HEDIS数据收集对医生执业的影响以及HEDIS数据对雇主、雇员和政府健康计划选择的影响。本研究对1993年至2001年的HealthStar数据库、PubMed数据库以及NCQA网站进行了全面回顾。NCQA认证被视为健康计划、资质验证机构和医生组织的一个重要行业里程碑。HEDIS的数据是从健康计划管理数据存储库收集的,而健康计划成员的临床数据可能是通过医生办公室的图表摘要收集的。在医生办公室进行数据收集会消耗医生执业机构和健康计划的管理资源。随着商业和政府保险公司越来越多地采用HEDIS衡量标准,给医生执业机构和弱势群体带来了复杂的影响。关于HEDIS对医疗服务不足人群医疗质量的改善以及医生执业成本仍存在一些问题。