Suppr超能文献

两种抗菌浸渍中心静脉导管的比较。导管研究组。

A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group.

作者信息

Darouiche R O, Raad I I, Heard S O, Thornby J I, Wenker O C, Gabrielli A, Berg J, Khardori N, Hanna H, Hachem R, Harris R L, Mayhall G

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 7;340(1):1-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of central venous catheters impregnated with either minocycline and rifampin or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine reduces the rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection as compared with the use of unimpregnated catheters. We compared the rates of catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection associated with these two kinds of antiinfective catheters.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial in 12 university-affiliated hospitals. High-risk adult patients in whom central venous catheters were expected to remain in place for three or more days were randomly assigned to undergo insertion of polyurethane, triple-lumen catheters impregnated with either minocycline and rifampin (on both the luminal and external surfaces) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (on only the external surface). After their removal, the tips and subcutaneous segments of the catheters were cultured by both the roll-plate and the sonication methods. Peripheral-blood cultures were obtained if clinically indicated.

RESULTS

Of 865 catheters inserted, 738 (85 percent) produced culture results that could be evaluated. The clinical characteristics of the patients and the risk factors for infection were similar in the two groups. Catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin were 1/3 as likely to be colonized as catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (28 of 356 catheters [7.9 percent] vs. 87 of 382 [22.8 percent], P<0.001), and catheter-related bloodstream infection was 1/12 as likely in catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin (1 of 356 [0.3 percent], vs. 13 of 382 [3.4 percent] for those impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine; P<0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of central venous catheters impregnated with minocycline and rifampin is associated with a lower rate of infection than the use of catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine.

摘要

背景

与使用未浸渍导管相比,使用浸渍米诺环素和利福平或洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银的中心静脉导管可降低导管定植率和导管相关血流感染率。我们比较了与这两种抗感染导管相关的导管定植率和导管相关血流感染率。

方法

我们在12家大学附属医院进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验。预计中心静脉导管将留置三天或更长时间的高危成年患者被随机分配接受插入浸渍米诺环素和利福平(在管腔和外表面)或洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银(仅在外表面)的聚氨酯三腔导管。拔除导管后,通过滚板法和超声法对导管尖端和皮下段进行培养。如有临床指征,采集外周血培养。

结果

在插入的865根导管中,738根(85%)产生了可评估的培养结果。两组患者的临床特征和感染危险因素相似。浸渍米诺环素和利福平的导管定植可能性是浸渍洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银导管的1/3(356根导管中有28根[7.9%],382根中有87根[22.8%],P<0.001),浸渍米诺环素和利福平的导管发生导管相关血流感染的可能性是浸渍洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银导管的1/12(356根中有1根[0.3%],浸渍洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银的382根中有13根[3.4%];P<0.002)。

结论

与使用浸渍洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银的导管相比,使用浸渍米诺环素和利福平的中心静脉导管感染率更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验