Swamy Varun, Fell Paul E, Body Misha, Keaney Michael B, Nyaku Mawuli K, McIlvain Elizabeth C, Keen Alice L
Department of Zoology, Goodwin-Niering Center for Conservation Biology and Environmental Studies, Connecticut College, New London 06320, USA.
Environ Manage. 2002 Apr;29(4):516-30. doi: 10.1007/s00267-001-0052-9.
During the last two decades, the State of Connecticut has restored tidal flow to many impounded salt marshes. One of the first of these and the one most extensively studied is Impoundment One in the Barn Island Wildlife Management Area in Stonington, Connecticut. In 1990, twelve years after the re-establishment of tidal flooding, the density of the marsh snail Melampus bidentatus, the numerically dominant macroinvertebrate of the high marsh, in Impoundment One was about half that in reference marshes below the breached impoundment dike. By 1999 the densities of Melampus above and below the dike were not significantly different, but the shell-free biomass was greater above the dike as a result of the somewhat larger number and size of the snails there. Twenty-one years after the renewal of tidal flooding, three marsh macroinvertebrates (the amphipods Orchestia grillus and Uhlorchestia spartinophila and the mussel Geukensia demissa) were significantly less abundant in the previously impounded marsh than in the reference marshes, whereas another amphipod (Gammarus palustris) was more abundant above the breached dike where conditions appeared to be somewhat wetter. In 1991 the fish assemblage in a mosquito-control ditch in Impoundment One was similar to that in a ditch below the breached dike; however, the common mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus appeared to be less abundant in the restoring marsh. By 1999 the number of mummichogs caught in ditches was significantly greater in Impoundment One than in the reference marsh, but the numbers of mummichogs trapped along the tidal creek were comparable above and below the dike. The results obtained in this study and those of other restoring marshes at Barn Island indicate the full recovery of certain animal populations following the reintroduction of tidal flow to impounded marshes may require up to two or more decades. Furthermore, not only do different species recover at different rates on a single marsh, but the time required for the recovery of a particular species may vary widely from marsh to marsh, often independently of other species.
在过去二十年里,康涅狄格州已恢复了许多蓄水盐沼的潮汐流动。其中最早恢复且研究最为广泛的是位于康涅狄格州斯托宁顿的巴恩岛野生动物管理区的一号蓄水区。1990年,在恢复潮汐淹没12年后,一号蓄水区中沼泽蜗牛双齿围沙蚕(Melampus bidentatus)的密度约为被破坏的蓄水区堤坝下方对照沼泽中该物种密度的一半,双齿围沙蚕是高沼泽中数量上占主导的大型无脊椎动物。到1999年,堤坝上下双齿围沙蚕的密度没有显著差异,但由于堤坝上方蜗牛的数量和体型略大,无壳生物量在堤坝上方更大。在恢复潮汐淹没21年后,三种沼泽大型无脊椎动物(片脚类动物Orchestia grillus和Uhlorchestia spartinophila以及贻贝Geukensia demissa)在先前蓄水的沼泽中的数量明显少于对照沼泽,而另一种片脚类动物(Gammarus palustris)在被破坏的堤坝上方数量更多,那里的条件似乎更湿润一些。1991年,一号蓄水区一条灭蚊沟渠中的鱼类群落与被破坏堤坝下方沟渠中的鱼类群落相似;然而,常见的食蚊鱼Fundulus heteroclitus在正在恢复的沼泽中数量似乎较少。到1999年,一号蓄水区沟渠中捕获的食蚊鱼数量显著多于对照沼泽,但在潮汐小溪沿线捕获的食蚊鱼数量在堤坝上下相当。本研究以及巴恩岛其他恢复中的沼泽所获得的结果表明,将潮汐流动重新引入蓄水沼泽后,某些动物种群的完全恢复可能需要长达二十年或更长时间。此外,不仅不同物种在单个沼泽中的恢复速度不同,而且特定物种恢复所需的时间在不同沼泽之间可能差异很大,通常与其他物种无关。