• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Protection for the good: subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast.

作者信息

Zellner Debra A, Kern Brett B, Parker Scott

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ 07043, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2002 Jun;38(3):175-80. doi: 10.1006/appe.2002.0476.

DOI:10.1006/appe.2002.0476
PMID:12071682
Abstract

Stimuli are rated less "good" when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category.

摘要

相似文献

1
Protection for the good: subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast.
Appetite. 2002 Jun;38(3):175-80. doi: 10.1006/appe.2002.0476.
2
Taste intensity and hedonic responses to simple beverages in gastrointestinal cancer patients.胃肠道癌症患者对简单饮品的味觉强度和享乐反应。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Nov;34(5):505-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.12.013. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
3
Contextual influences on liking and preference.情境对喜爱和偏好的影响。
Appetite. 2007 Nov;49(3):679-82. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 May 18.
4
Retronasal olfaction in vegetable liking and disliking.对蔬菜的好恶与鼻后嗅觉。
Chem Senses. 2013 Jan;38(1):45-55. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjs080. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
5
Liking and exposure: first, second and tenth time around.喜好与接触:初次、再次及第十次接触。
Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30;89(1):47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.01.036. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
6
Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):468-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03196508.
7
Categorization reduces the effect of context on hedonic preference.分类减少了情境对享乐偏好的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Aug;71(6):1228-32. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.6.1228.
8
Self-prediction of hedonic trajectories for repeated use of body products and foods: poor performance, not improved by a full generation of experience.对身体护理产品和食物重复使用的享乐轨迹进行自我预测:表现不佳,即便经过整整一代人的体验也未得到改善。
Appetite. 2006 May;46(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.01.016. Epub 2006 Mar 31.
9
Beauty beyond compare: effects of context extremity and categorization on hedonic contrast.无与伦比的美丽:语境极端和分类对享乐对比的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Feb;39(1):16-22. doi: 10.1037/a0031020. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
10
Providing information about a flavor to preschoolers: effects on liking and memory for having tasted it.向学龄前儿童提供有关一种口味的信息:对品尝后的喜好和记忆的影响。
Chem Senses. 2007 Jul;32(6):505-13. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjm019. Epub 2007 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental Aesthetic Value Influences the Intention for Moral Behavior: Changes in Behavioral Moral Judgment.环境审美价值影响道德行为意向:行为道德判断的变化。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;18(12):6477. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126477.
2
The categorization effect in hedonic contrast: experts differ from novices.享乐性对比中的分类效应:专家与新手的差异。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):179-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03194047.
3
Compared to what? Effects of categorization on hedonic contrast.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):468-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03196508.