Suppr超能文献

农业健康研究中一种用于估算农药暴露量的定量方法。

A quantitative approach for estimating exposure to pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study.

作者信息

Dosemeci Mustafa, Alavanja Michael C R, Rowland Andrew S, Mage David, Zahm Shelia Hoar, Rothman Nathaniel, Lubin Jay H, Hoppin Jane A, Sandler Dale P, Blair Aaron

机构信息

National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Mar;46(2):245-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mef011.

Abstract

We developed a quantitative method to estimate long-term chemical-specific pesticide exposures in a large prospective cohort study of more than 58000 pesticide applicators in North Carolina and Iowa. An enrollment questionnaire was administered to applicators to collect basic time- and intensity-related information on pesticide exposure such as mixing condition, duration and frequency of application, application methods and personal protective equipment used. In addition, a detailed take-home questionnaire was administered to collect further intensity-related exposure information such as maintenance or repair of mixing and application equipment, work practices and personal hygiene. More than 40% of the enrolled applicators responded to this detailed take-home questionnaire. Two algorithms were developed to identify applicators' exposure scenarios using information from the enrollment and take-home questionnaires separately in the calculation of subject-specific intensity of exposure score to individual pesticides. The 'general algorithm' used four basic variables (i.e. mixing status, application method, equipment repair status and personal protective equipment use) from the enrollment questionnaire and measurement data from the published pesticide exposure literature to calculate estimated intensity of exposure to individual pesticides for each applicator. The 'detailed' algorithm was based on variables in the general algorithm plus additional exposure information from the take-home questionnaire, including types of mixing system used (i.e. enclosed or open), having a tractor with enclosed cab and/or charcoal filter, frequency of washing equipment after application, frequency of replacing old gloves, personal hygiene and changing clothes after a spill. Weighting factors applied in both algorithms were estimated using measurement data from the published pesticide exposure literature and professional judgment. For each study subject, chemical-specific lifetime cumulative pesticide exposure levels were derived by combining intensity of pesticide exposure as calculated by the two algorithms independently and duration/frequency of pesticide use from the questionnaire. Distributions of duration, intensity and cumulative exposure levels of 2,4-D and chlorpyrifos are presented by state, gender, age group and applicator type (i.e. farmer or commercial applicator) for the entire enrollment cohort and for the sub-cohort of applicators who responded to the take-home questionnaire. The distribution patterns of all basic exposure indices (i.e. intensity, duration and cumulative exposure to 2,4-D and chlorpyrifos) by state, gender, age and applicator type were almost identical in two study populations, indicating that the take-home questionnaire sub-cohort of applicators is representative of the entire cohort in terms of exposure.

摘要

在对北卡罗来纳州和爱荷华州58000多名农药施用者进行的一项大型前瞻性队列研究中,我们开发了一种定量方法来估计长期特定化学农药暴露情况。向施用者发放了一份登记调查问卷,以收集与农药暴露的基本时间和强度相关的信息,如混合条件、施用持续时间和频率、施用方法以及所使用的个人防护装备。此外,还发放了一份详细的带回家调查问卷,以收集更多与强度相关的暴露信息,如混合和施用设备的维护或修理、工作习惯和个人卫生情况。超过40%的登记施用者回复了这份详细的带回家调查问卷。开发了两种算法,分别使用登记调查问卷和带回家调查问卷中的信息来识别施用者的暴露场景,以计算个体对每种农药的特定强度暴露得分。“通用算法”使用登记调查问卷中的四个基本变量(即混合状态、施用方法、设备修理状态和个人防护装备使用情况)以及已发表的农药暴露文献中的测量数据,来计算每个施用者对每种农药的估计暴露强度。“详细”算法基于通用算法中的变量,再加上带回家调查问卷中的额外暴露信息,包括所使用的混合系统类型(即封闭式或开放式)、是否有带封闭式驾驶室和/或活性炭过滤器的拖拉机、施用后清洗设备的频率、更换旧手套的频率、个人卫生情况以及溢出后更换衣服的情况。两种算法中应用的加权因子是根据已发表的农药暴露文献中的测量数据和专业判断来估计的。对于每个研究对象,通过独立结合两种算法计算出的农药暴露强度以及调查问卷中的农药使用持续时间/频率,得出特定化学物质的终生累积农药暴露水平。按州、性别、年龄组和施用者类型(即农民或商业施用者)展示了整个登记队列以及回复了带回家调查问卷的施用者子队列中2,4 - D和毒死蜱的持续时间分布、强度分布和累积暴露水平。在两个研究人群中,按州、性别、年龄和施用者类型划分的所有基本暴露指标(即2,4 - D和毒死蜱的强度、持续时间和累积暴露)的分布模式几乎相同,这表明就暴露情况而言,回复了带回家调查问卷的施用者子队列代表了整个队列。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验