• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于定量估计农业健康研究中配偶非职业性农药暴露强度的算法。

An algorithm for quantitatively estimating non-occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses in the Agricultural Health Study.

机构信息

Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;29(3):344-357. doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0088-z. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1038/s41370-018-0088-z
PMID:30375516
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6470005/
Abstract

Residents of agricultural areas experience pesticide exposures from sources other than direct agricultural work. We developed a quantitative, active ingredient-specific algorithm for cumulative (adult, married lifetime) non-occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses of farmers who applied pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study (AHS). The algorithm addressed three exposure pathways: take-home, agricultural drift, and residential pesticide use. Pathway-specific equations combined (i) weights derived from previous meta-analyses of published pesticide exposure data and (ii) information from the questionnaire on frequency and duration of pesticide use by applicators, home proximity to treated fields, residential pesticide usage (e.g., termite treatments), and spouse's off-farm employment (proxy for time at home). The residential use equation also incorporated a published probability matrix that documented the likelihood active ingredients were used in home pest treatment products. We illustrate use of these equations by calculating exposure intensities for the insecticide chlorpyrifos and herbicide atrazine for 19,959 spouses. Non-zero estimates for ≥1 pathway were found for 78% and 77% of spouses for chlorpyrifos and atrazine, respectively. Variability in exposed spouses' intensity estimates was observed for both pesticides, with 75th to 25th percentile ratios ranging from 7.1 to 7.3 for take-home, 6.5 to 8.5 for drift, 2.4 to 2.8 for residential use, and 3.8 to 7.0 for the summed pathways. Take-home and drift estimates were highly correlated (≥0.98), but were not correlated with residential use (0.01‒0.02). This algorithm represents an important advancement in quantifying non-occupational pesticide relative exposure differences and will facilitate improved etiologic analyses in the AHS spouses. The algorithm could be adapted to studies with similar information.

摘要

农业地区的居民会接触到除直接农业工作以外的其他来源的农药。我们为参加农业健康研究(AHS)的农民配偶(他们使用农药)开发了一种定量的、针对活性成分的、累积(成人、已婚终生)非职业性农药接触强度的算法。该算法解决了三条暴露途径:携带回家、农业飘移和住宅农药使用。特定途径的方程结合了:(i) 来自之前关于已发表的农药暴露数据的荟萃分析的权重,以及 (ii) 问卷中关于施药者使用农药的频率和持续时间、家庭与施药农田的接近程度、住宅农药使用(例如,白蚁处理)以及配偶的非农就业(家庭时间的替代指标)的信息。住宅使用方程还纳入了一份已发表的概率矩阵,该矩阵记录了活性成分在家庭害虫处理产品中使用的可能性。我们通过计算 19959 名配偶的杀虫剂毒死蜱和除草剂莠去津的暴露强度来举例说明这些方程的使用。对于毒死蜱和莠去津,分别有 78%和 77%的配偶在至少一条途径中有非零估计值。对于这两种农药,暴露配偶的强度估计值都存在差异,从 75%到 25%的比值范围分别为 7.1 到 7.3(携带回家)、6.5 到 8.5(飘移)、2.4 到 2.8(住宅使用)以及 3.8 到 7.0(总和)。携带回家和飘移的估计值高度相关(≥0.98),但与住宅使用不相关(0.01-0.02)。该算法在量化非职业性农药相对暴露差异方面是一个重要的进步,将有助于改善 AHS 配偶的病因分析。该算法可以适用于具有类似信息的研究。

相似文献

1
An algorithm for quantitatively estimating non-occupational pesticide exposure intensity for spouses in the Agricultural Health Study.一种用于定量估计农业健康研究中配偶非职业性农药暴露强度的算法。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;29(3):344-357. doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0088-z. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
2
Assessment of a pesticide exposure intensity algorithm in the agricultural health study.农业健康研究中农药暴露强度算法的评估。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;20(6):559-69. doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.54. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
3
A quantitative approach for estimating exposure to pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study.农业健康研究中一种用于估算农药暴露量的定量方法。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Mar;46(2):245-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mef011.
4
A Method for Semi-quantitative Assessment of Exposure to Pesticides of Applicators and Re-entry Workers: An Application in Three Farming Systems in Ethiopia.一种对施药者和重新进入作业区工人农药接触情况进行半定量评估的方法:在埃塞俄比亚三种农业系统中的应用
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Jul;60(6):669-83. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew022. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
5
Factor analysis of pesticide use patterns among pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study.农业健康研究中农药施用者农药使用模式的因子分析
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2005 May;15(3):225-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500396.
6
Relative Contributions of Agricultural Drift, Para-Occupational, and Residential Use Exposure Pathways to House Dust Pesticide Concentrations: Meta-Regression of Published Data.农业漂移、准职业和住宅使用暴露途径对室内灰尘中农药浓度的相对贡献:已发表数据的元回归分析
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar;125(3):296-305. doi: 10.1289/EHP426. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
7
Systematic Literature Review of the Take-Home Route of Pesticide Exposure via Biomonitoring and Environmental Monitoring.通过生物监测和环境监测对经家庭途径摄入的农药暴露进行的系统文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 19;16(12):2177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16122177.
8
Pesticide use and practices in an Iowa farm family pesticide exposure study.爱荷华州一个农场家庭农药暴露研究中的农药使用与实践
J Agric Saf Health. 2002 Nov;8(4):423-33. doi: 10.13031/2013.10222.
9
Pesticides in house dust from urban and farmworker households in California: an observational measurement study.加利福尼亚州城市和农场工人家庭室内灰尘中的农药:一项观察性测量研究。
Environ Health. 2011 Mar 16;10:19. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-10-19.
10
Quantitative measures of recent and lifetime agricultural pesticide use are associated with increased pesticide concentrations in house dust.定量测量近期和终生农业农药使用与室内灰尘中农药浓度增加有关。
Environ Int. 2024 Nov;193:109123. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109123. Epub 2024 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Completeness of variables in Hospital-Based Cancer Registries for prostatic malignant neoplasm.基于医院的前列腺恶性肿瘤癌症登记处的变量完整性。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Jul 29;77(3):e20230467. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0467. eCollection 2024.
2
Research Recommendations for Selected IARC-Classified Agents: Impact and Lessons Learned.研究建议选定的国际癌症研究机构分类剂:影响和经验教训。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Oct;131(10):105001. doi: 10.1289/EHP12547. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Geospatial Assessment of Pesticide Concentration in Ambient Air and Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Arkansas, 2013-2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Insecticide Use and Breast Cancer Risk among Farmers' Wives in the Agricultural Health Study.农业健康研究中农民妻子的杀虫剂使用与乳腺癌风险
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Sep 6;125(9):097002. doi: 10.1289/EHP1295.
2
A prospective study of cancer risk among Agricultural Health Study farm spouses associated with personal use of organochlorine insecticides.农业健康研究中农场配偶个人使用有机氯杀虫剂与癌症风险的前瞻性研究。
Environ Health. 2017 Sep 6;16(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0298-1.
3
New Opportunities in Exposure Assessment of Occupational Epidemiology: Use of Measurements to Aid Exposure Reconstruction in Population-Based Studies.
2013 - 2017年阿肯色州环境空气中农药浓度与结直肠癌发病率的地理空间评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;19(6):3258. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063258.
4
Association between pesticide exposure and colorectal cancer risk and incidence: A systematic review.农药暴露与结直肠癌风险和发病的相关性:系统评价。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Aug;219:112327. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112327. Epub 2021 May 21.
5
Pesticide Exposure of Residents Living Close to Agricultural Fields in the Netherlands: Protocol for an Observational Study.荷兰靠近农田居民的农药暴露情况:一项观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 28;10(4):e27883. doi: 10.2196/27883.
6
Evaluation of work place pesticide concentration and health complaints among women workers in tea plantation, Southern India.印度南部茶园女工工作场所农药浓度与健康投诉评估。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2021 May;31(3):560-570. doi: 10.1038/s41370-020-00284-3. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
A case-control study of breast cancer risk and ambient exposure to pesticides.一项关于乳腺癌风险与环境中农药暴露的病例对照研究。
Environ Epidemiol. 2019 Oct 14;3(5):e070. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000070. eCollection 2019 Oct.
职业流行病学暴露评估中的新机遇:在基于人群的研究中使用测量值辅助暴露重建。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Sep;4(3):355-363. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0153-0.
4
Determinants of children's exposure to pyrethroid insecticides in western France.法国西部儿童接触拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的决定因素。
Environ Int. 2017 Jul;104:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
Relative Contributions of Agricultural Drift, Para-Occupational, and Residential Use Exposure Pathways to House Dust Pesticide Concentrations: Meta-Regression of Published Data.农业漂移、准职业和住宅使用暴露途径对室内灰尘中农药浓度的相对贡献:已发表数据的元回归分析
Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Mar;125(3):296-305. doi: 10.1289/EHP426. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Temporal Trends of Insecticide Concentrations in Carpet Dust in California from 2001 to 2006.2001年至2006年加利福尼亚州地毯灰尘中杀虫剂浓度的时间趋势
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jul 19;50(14):7761-9. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b00252. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
A Method for Semi-quantitative Assessment of Exposure to Pesticides of Applicators and Re-entry Workers: An Application in Three Farming Systems in Ethiopia.一种对施药者和重新进入作业区工人农药接触情况进行半定量评估的方法:在埃塞俄比亚三种农业系统中的应用
Ann Occup Hyg. 2016 Jul;60(6):669-83. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mew022. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
8
Associations between self-reported pest treatments and pesticide concentrations in carpet dust.自我报告的害虫防治措施与地毯灰尘中农药浓度之间的关联。
Environ Health. 2015 Mar 25;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s12940-015-0015-x.
9
The Australian Work Exposures Study: prevalence of occupational exposure to diesel engine exhaust.澳大利亚工作场所暴露研究:职业性接触柴油机废气的患病率
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Jun;59(5):600-8. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev006. Epub 2015 Feb 22.
10
A review of nonoccupational pathways for pesticide exposure in women living in agricultural areas.对生活在农业地区的女性接触农药的非职业途径的综述。
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Jun;123(6):515-24. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408273. Epub 2015 Jan 30.