Suppr超能文献

农业健康研究中的风险接受人格与个人防护设备使用。

Risk-accepting personality and personal protective equipment use within the Agricultural Health Study.

机构信息

Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):264-76. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2012.686390.

Abstract

Pesticide exposures can be reduced by use of personal protective equipment as well as proper mixing and application practices. The authors examined the effects of risk-accepting personality on personal protective equipment (PPE) use and mixing and application practices among private pesticide applicators and their spouses within the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) in Iowa and North Carolina and commercial applicators in Iowa. The AHS follow-up questionnaire included four questions designed to assess attitudes toward risk. Analysis was limited to those who were currently working on a farm or registered as a commercial applicator and indicated current pesticide use (n=25,166). Respondents who answered three or more questions in the affirmative (private applicators: n=4160 [21%]; commercial applicators: n=199 [14%]; spouses: n=829 [23%]) were classified as having a risk-accepting personality. Logistic regression was used to evaluate specific work practices associated with risk-accepting attitudes. Among private applicators, the likelihood of using any PPE when mixing or loading pesticides was lower among risk-acceptors compared to risk-averse individuals (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-0.79). A similar relationship was observed among commercial applicators (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.34-1.77) but not among spouses (OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.90-1.33). Among private applicators, risk-acceptors were more likely than the risk-averse to apply pesticides within 50 feet of the home (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.44), compared to further than ¼ mile. These findings suggest that the decisions to use personal protective equipment and properly handle/apply pesticides may be driven by risk-accepting personality traits.

摘要

通过使用个人防护设备以及正确的混合和应用实践,可以减少农药暴露。作者在爱荷华州和北卡罗来纳州的农业健康研究(AHS)中以及爱荷华州的商业施药者中,研究了风险接受型人格对私人施药者及其配偶使用个人防护设备(PPE)以及混合和应用实践的影响。AHS 随访问卷包括四个旨在评估态度的问题风险。分析仅限于目前在农场工作或注册为商业施药者并表示当前使用农药的人(n=25166)。回答三个或更多肯定问题的受访者(私人施药者:n=4160[21%];商业施药者:n=199[14%];配偶:n=829[23%])被归类为具有风险接受型人格。使用逻辑回归评估与风险接受态度相关的特定工作实践。在私人施药者中,与风险规避个体相比,混合或装农药时使用任何 PPE 的可能性较低(比值比[OR]=0.72,95%置信区间[CI]:0.65-0.79)。在商业施药者中也观察到类似的关系(OR=0.77,95%CI:0.34-1.77),但在配偶中则没有(OR=1.09,95%CI:0.90-1.33)。在私人施药者中,与风险规避者相比,风险接受者更有可能在距离房屋 50 英尺内施药(OR=1.21,95%CI:1.01-1.44),而不是超过四分之一英里。这些发现表明,使用个人防护设备和正确处理/应用农药的决定可能受到风险接受型人格特质的驱动。

相似文献

1
Risk-accepting personality and personal protective equipment use within the Agricultural Health Study.
J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):264-76. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2012.686390.
2
A quantitative approach for estimating exposure to pesticides in the Agricultural Health Study.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2002 Mar;46(2):245-60. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mef011.
3
Characteristics of pesticide use in a pesticide applicator cohort: the Agricultural Health Study.
Environ Res. 1999 Feb;80(2 Pt 1):172-9. doi: 10.1006/enrs.1998.3888.
5
High pesticide exposure events among farmers and spouses enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study.
J Agric Saf Health. 2006 May;12(2):101-16. doi: 10.13031/2013.20385.
7
Suicide and pesticide use among pesticide applicators and their spouses in the agricultural health study.
Environ Health Perspect. 2011 Nov;119(11):1610-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103413. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
8
Depression and pesticide exposures among private pesticide applicators enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study.
Environ Health Perspect. 2008 Dec;116(12):1713-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11091. Epub 2008 Sep 9.
10
Overall and cause-specific mortality in a cohort of farmers and their spouses.
Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep;76(9):632-643. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-105724.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of unintentional acute pesticide poisoning among smallholder vegetable farmers in Trinidad and Jamaica.
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;12:1470276. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1470276. eCollection 2024.
2
A Comparison of Pesticide Risk Beliefs between Farmers and Farmworkers: Implications for Risk Communication and Education.
J Agromedicine. 2021 Oct;26(4):436-440. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2021.1879698. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of captan air and dermal exposures among orchard pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2011 Jul;55(6):620-33. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mer008. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
7
End-users' knowledge, attitude, and behavior towards safe use of pesticides: a case study in the Guanting Reservoir area, China.
Environ Geochem Health. 2007 Dec;29(6):513-20. doi: 10.1007/s10653-007-9120-2. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
8
Training and other predictors of personal protective equipment use in Australian grain farmers using pesticides.
Occup Environ Med. 2008 Feb;65(2):141-6. doi: 10.1136/oem.2007.034843. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
10
Studying health outcomes in farmworker populations exposed to pesticides.
Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Jun;114(6):953-60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8526.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验