Primosch Robert E, Brooks Richard
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610-0426, USA.
Am J Dent. 2002 Feb;15(1):15-20.
To compare pain response between two different flow rates (slow versus fast) of local anesthetic solution injected into palatal tissue using the recently available Wand Local Anesthetic System (WLAS), which provides the technologic advance to permit reliable replication of constant injection flow rates, regardless of tissue resistance.
Twenty adult subjects received bilateral palatal injections of local anesthetic in random sequence during the same appointment following topical anesthesia application. Pain response was measured by subjective self-report using a visual analogue scale, a quantified verbal descriptor scale, and a comparison to prior injection experience, as well as an operator's global assessment of the subject's pain response. Heart rate, as a physiologic indicator of pain response, was also recorded.
All measurements of pain response were statistically less for the slow compared to the fast injection rate. No significant difference in mean heart rate, however, was demonstrated between the two flow rates. A slow, constant flow rate (161 sec/mL) of a 0.3 mL volume of local anesthetic solution was statistically less painful than a fast flow rate (29 sec/mL) during palatal injection. Contrary to the manufacturer's claim, the WLAS reduced but did not eliminate pain elicited by palatal injections in some patients.
使用最近可用的万得局部麻醉系统(WLAS)比较注入腭部组织的两种不同流速(慢与快)的局部麻醉溶液之间的疼痛反应,该系统提供了技术进步,能够可靠地复制恒定的注射流速,而不受组织阻力的影响。
20名成年受试者在局部麻醉应用后的同一预约期间,按随机顺序接受双侧腭部局部麻醉注射。疼痛反应通过主观自我报告进行测量,使用视觉模拟量表、量化的语言描述量表,并与先前的注射体验进行比较,以及由操作者对受试者的疼痛反应进行总体评估。还记录了心率,作为疼痛反应的生理指标。
与快速注射速率相比,慢速注射速率下所有疼痛反应测量值在统计学上均更低。然而,两种流速之间的平均心率没有显著差异。在腭部注射期间,0.3毫升局部麻醉溶液的缓慢、恒定流速(161秒/毫升)在统计学上比快速流速(29秒/毫升)引起的疼痛更小。与制造商的说法相反,WLAS减轻了但并未消除一些患者腭部注射引起的疼痛。