Suppr超能文献

使用计算机化局部麻醉(Wand)和传统注射器评估局部麻醉期间的痛觉。

The assessment of pain sensation during local anesthesia using a computerized local anesthesia (Wand) and a conventional syringe.

作者信息

Ram Diana, Peretz Benjamin

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hebrew University Hadassah School of Dental Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

J Dent Child (Chic). 2003 May-Aug;70(2):130-3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the behavior reaction of children who received local anesthesia with a conventional syringe injection and a computerized device (Wand).

METHODS

One hundred and two children ages 3 to 10 years were selected for this study. In 1 group there were 55 children between the ages of 3 to 5 years old, and in the other group there were 47 children ages 6 to 10 years old. They all needed at least 2 clinical sessions of operative procedures, preceded by a local anesthetic injection, 1 on either side of the same jaw. The local anesthesia was delivered using either the Wand or the traditional syringe. A random crossover design was used so that each child served as his/her own control.

RESULTS

There were 25 girls and 30 boys in group A (mean 4.1 +/- 0.6 years), and 26 boys and 21 girls in group B (mean 7.2 +/- 1.3 years). Most of the children had a good reaction to both techniques of local anesthesia. No significant difference in either group was found between boys and girls. The children's reactions to injection in the mandible or the maxilla with the Wand or the conventional technique, regarding crying, facial expression, hands, legs and torso movements were similar with no statistically significant difference. There was no statistical difference when the maxillary infiltration was delivered to 1 or multiple teeth. No significant difference was found when the Wand was delivered during the first or second visit.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggested there was no difference in the pain behavior of children during the administration of local anesthesia with a conventional injection or a computerized device when the operator was an experienced pediatric dentist. This was true for maxillary infiltration and mandibular block. For other techniques, such as palatal injection and periodontal ligament injection, more studies should be conducted.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较接受传统注射器注射局部麻醉和使用电脑化设备(Wand)进行局部麻醉的儿童的行为反应。

方法

选取102名3至10岁的儿童参与本研究。其中一组有55名3至5岁的儿童,另一组有47名6至10岁的儿童。他们都至少需要进行2次临床手术操作,术前需进行局部麻醉注射,在同一侧颌骨的两侧各注射1次。局部麻醉采用Wand或传统注射器进行。采用随机交叉设计,使每个儿童作为自己的对照。

结果

A组有25名女孩和30名男孩(平均年龄4.1±0.6岁),B组有26名男孩和21名女孩(平均年龄7.2±1.3岁)。大多数儿童对两种局部麻醉技术的反应良好。两组中男孩和女孩之间均未发现显著差异。儿童在使用Wand或传统技术在下颌骨或上颌骨注射时,在哭闹、面部表情、手部、腿部和躯干运动方面的反应相似,无统计学显著差异。在上颌浸润麻醉1颗或多颗牙齿时,未发现统计学差异。在第一次或第二次就诊时使用Wand进行麻醉,也未发现显著差异。

结论

结果表明,当操作者为经验丰富的儿童牙医时,使用传统注射器或电脑化设备进行局部麻醉时,儿童的疼痛行为没有差异。在上颌浸润麻醉和下颌阻滞麻醉方面都是如此。对于其他技术,如腭部注射和牙周膜注射,应进行更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验