McCaughan Dorothy, Thompson Carl, Cullum Nicky, Sheldon Trevor A, Thompson David R
Centre for Evidence Based Nursing, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jul;39(1):46-60. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02241.x.
To examine the barriers that nurses feel prevent them from using research in the decisions they make.
A sizeable research literature focusing on research utilization in nursing has developed over the past 20 years. However, this literature is characterized by a number of weaknesses: self-reported utilization behaviour; poor response rates and small, nonrandom sampling strategies.
Cross-case analysis involving anonymised qualitative interviews, observation, documentary audit and Q methodological modelling of shared subjectivities amongst nurses. The case sites were three large acute hospitals in the north of England. One hundred and eight nurses were interviewed, 61 of whom were also observed for a total of 180 h, and 122 nurses were involved in the Q modelling exercise (response rate of 64%).
Four perspectives were isolated that encompassed the characteristics associated with barriers to research use. These related to the individual, organization, nature of research information itself and environment. Nurses clustered around four main perspectives on the barriers to research use: (1) Problems in interpreting and using research products, which were seen as too complex, 'academic' and overly statistical; (2) Nurses who felt confident with research-based information perceived a lack of organizational support as a significant block; (3) Many nurses felt that researchers and research products lack clinical credibility and that they fail to offer the desired level of clinical direction; (4) Some nurses lacked the skills and, to a lesser degree, the motivation to use research themselves. These individuals liked research messages passed on to them by a third party and sought to foster others' involvement in research-based practice, rather than becoming directly involved themselves.
Rejection of research knowledge is not a barrier to its application. Rather, the presentation and management of research knowledge in the workplace represent significant challenges for clinicians, policy-makers and the research community.
探讨护士认为阻碍他们在决策中运用研究成果的障碍。
在过去20年里,已形成了大量关注护理领域研究应用的文献。然而,这些文献存在一些弱点:自我报告的应用行为;低回复率以及小样本、非随机抽样策略。
跨案例分析,包括匿名定性访谈、观察、文献审核以及对护士群体主观性的Q方法建模。案例地点为英格兰北部的三家大型急症医院。对108名护士进行了访谈,其中61名护士还接受了总计180小时的观察,122名护士参与了Q建模练习(回复率为64%)。
分离出了四个观点,这些观点包含了与研究应用障碍相关的特征。这些观点与个人、组织、研究信息本身的性质以及环境有关。护士们围绕研究应用障碍的四个主要观点形成了不同群体:(1)在解释和使用研究成果方面存在问题,这些成果被认为过于复杂、“学术化”且统计性过强;(2)对基于研究的信息有信心的护士认为缺乏组织支持是一个重大障碍;(3)许多护士认为研究人员和研究成果缺乏临床可信度,且未能提供期望的临床指导水平;(4)一些护士缺乏运用研究的技能,在较小程度上也缺乏运用研究的动力。这些人喜欢由第三方传递给他们的研究信息,并试图促进他人参与基于研究的实践,而不是自己直接参与。
对研究知识的排斥并非其应用的障碍。相反,工作场所中研究知识的呈现和管理对临床医生、政策制定者和研究界构成了重大挑战。