• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

量身定制的博客和内容对网络CIPHER使用情况的影响——一个帮助政策制定者更好地利用研究证据的在线平台。

Impact of tailored blogs and content on usage of Web CIPHER - an online platform to help policymakers better engage with evidence from research.

作者信息

Makkar Steve R, Howe Megan, Williamson Anna, Gilham Frances

机构信息

The Sax Institute, Level 13, Building 10, 235 Jones Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Dec 1;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0157-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-016-0157-5
PMID:27905937
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5134066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need to develop innovations that can help bridge the gap between research and policy. Web CIPHER is an online tool designed to help policymakers better engage with research in order to increase its use in health policymaking. The aim of the present study was to test interventions in order to increase policymakers' usage of Web CIPHER. Namely, the impact of posting articles and blogs on topics relevant to the missions and scope of selected policy agencies in the Web CIPHER community.

METHODS

Five policy agencies were targeted for the intervention. Web CIPHER usage data was gathered over a 30-month period using Google Analytics. Time series analysis was used to evaluate whether publication of tailored articles and blogs led to significant changes in usage for all Web CIPHER members from policy agencies, including those from the five target agencies. We further evaluated whether these users showed greater increases in usage following publication of articles and blogs directly targeted at their agency, and if these effects were moderated by the blog author.

RESULTS

Web CIPHER usage gradually increased over time and was significantly predicted by the number of articles but not blogs that were posted throughout the study period. Publication of articles on sexual and reproductive health was followed by sustained increases in usage among all users, including users from the policy agency that targets this area. This effect of topic relevance did not occur for the four remaining target agencies. Finally, page views were higher for articles targeted at one's agency compared to other agencies. This effect also occurred for blogs, particularly when the author was internal to one's agency.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that Web CIPHER usage in general was motivated by general interest, engagement and appeal, as opposed to the agency specificity of content and work relevance. Blogs in and of themselves may not be effective at promoting usage. Thus, in order to increase policymakers' engagement with research through similar online platforms, a potentially effective approach would be to post abundant, frequently updated, engaging, interesting and widely appealing content irrespective of form.

摘要

背景

需要开发能够帮助弥合研究与政策之间差距的创新举措。网络密码信息平台(Web CIPHER)是一款在线工具,旨在帮助政策制定者更好地参与研究,以提高其在卫生政策制定中的应用。本研究的目的是测试干预措施,以增加政策制定者对网络密码信息平台的使用。具体而言,是在网络密码信息平台社区发布与选定政策机构的使命和范围相关主题的文章和博客的影响。

方法

选取了五个政策机构作为干预对象。使用谷歌分析工具在30个月的时间内收集网络密码信息平台的使用数据。采用时间序列分析来评估发布量身定制的文章和博客是否会导致来自政策机构的所有网络密码信息平台成员(包括来自五个目标机构的成员)的使用量发生显著变化。我们进一步评估了这些用户在发布直接针对其机构的文章和博客后使用量是否有更大幅度的增加,以及这些影响是否受博客作者的调节。

结果

随着时间的推移,网络密码信息平台的使用量逐渐增加,并且在整个研究期间发布的文章数量而非博客数量能够显著预测使用量。发布关于性健康和生殖健康的文章后,所有用户(包括针对该领域的政策机构的用户)的使用量持续增加。对于其余四个目标机构,这种主题相关性的影响并未出现。最后,与针对其他机构的文章相比,针对自身机构的文章的页面浏览量更高。这种影响在博客方面也存在,尤其是当博客作者来自自身机构内部时。

结论

研究结果表明,总体而言,网络密码信息平台的使用是由普遍兴趣、参与度和吸引力驱动的,而非内容的机构特定性和工作相关性。博客本身可能在促进使用方面并不有效。因此,为了通过类似的在线平台增加政策制定者对研究的参与度,一种可能有效的方法是发布丰富、频繁更新、引人入胜、有趣且具有广泛吸引力的内容,而不论其形式如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b622/5134066/fc6f495a14c0/12961_2016_157_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b622/5134066/2f502b7b3595/12961_2016_157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b622/5134066/fc6f495a14c0/12961_2016_157_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b622/5134066/2f502b7b3595/12961_2016_157_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b622/5134066/fc6f495a14c0/12961_2016_157_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of tailored blogs and content on usage of Web CIPHER - an online platform to help policymakers better engage with evidence from research.量身定制的博客和内容对网络CIPHER使用情况的影响——一个帮助政策制定者更好地利用研究证据的在线平台。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Dec 1;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0157-5.
2
Usage of an online tool to help policymakers better engage with research: Web CIPHER.使用在线工具帮助政策制定者更好地参与研究:网络密码(Web CIPHER)。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 23;10:56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0241-1.
3
Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research.SEER(寻求、参与和评估研究)的开发与验证:一项衡量政策制定者参与和利用研究能力的指标。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jan 17;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0162-8.
4
How blogs support the transfer of knowledge into practice in the field of dementia palliative care: a survey of facilitators and barriers.博客如何支持痴呆症姑息治疗领域知识向实践的转移:促进因素和障碍的调查。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 1;21(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01001-7.
5
Blogs as a way to elicit feedback on research and engage stakeholders.博客作为一种获取研究反馈并让利益相关者参与的方式。
Nurse Res. 2015 Jan;22(3):41-7. doi: 10.7748/nr.22.3.41.e1300.
6
Blog/web log - a new easy and interactive website building tool for a non-net savvy radiologist.博客/网络日志——一种面向不精通网络的放射科医生的新型简易且交互式网站建设工具。
J Thorac Imaging. 2007 May;22(2):115-9. doi: 10.1097/01.rti.0000213578.47398.aa.
7
Public anxiety and information seeking following the H1N1 outbreak: blogs, newspaper articles, and Wikipedia visits.甲型 H1N1 流感爆发后的公众焦虑和信息寻求:博客、报纸文章和维基百科访问。
Health Commun. 2012;27(2):179-85. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2011.571759. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
8
Preliminary testing of the reliability and feasibility of SAGE: a system to measure and score engagement with and use of research in health policies and programs.SAGE 系统测量和评分参与和使用卫生政策与项目研究的可靠性和可行性的初步测试:一个系统来测量和评分参与和使用卫生政策与项目研究的可靠性和可行性的研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0676-7.
9
An assessment of policymakers' engagement initiatives to promote evidence informed health policy making in Nigeria.对尼日利亚政策制定者为促进基于证据的卫生政策制定而开展的参与举措的评估。
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 May 24;27:57. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.27.57.9844. eCollection 2017.
10
Policymakers' experience of a capacity-building intervention designed to increase their use of research: a realist process evaluation.政策制定者对旨在提高其研究使用的能力建设干预措施的经验:一个现实主义的过程评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Nov 23;15(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0234-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual and institutional capacity-building for evidence-informed health policy-making in Iran: a mix of local and global evidence.伊朗基于证据的卫生决策制定的个人和机构能力建设:本地和全球证据的混合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 12;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00816-3.
2
Knowledge translation strategies for policy and action focused on sexual, reproductive, maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and well-being: a rapid scoping review.知识转化策略在政策和行动方面聚焦于性健康、生殖健康、母婴健康、新生儿健康、儿童健康和青少年健康及福祉:快速范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 17;12(1):e053919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053919.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Usage of an online tool to help policymakers better engage with research: Web CIPHER.使用在线工具帮助政策制定者更好地参与研究:网络密码(Web CIPHER)。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 23;10:56. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0241-1.
2
Strengthening capacity to apply health research evidence in policy making: experience from four countries.加强在政策制定中应用卫生研究证据的能力:来自四个国家的经验。
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):161-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv032. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
3
How Can the Use of Evidence in Mental Health Policy Be Increased? A Systematic Review.
Factors influencing sustainability of online platforms for professionals: a mixed-method study in OECD countries.
影响专业人员在线平台可持续性的因素:经合组织国家的混合方法研究。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Feb 17;37(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab063.
4
Pennsylvania policymakers' knowledge, attitudes and likelihood for action regarding waterpipe tobacco smoking and electronic nicotine delivery systems.宾夕法尼亚州政策制定者关于水烟吸食和电子尼古丁传送系统的知识、态度及采取行动的可能性。
Tob Prev Cessat. 2018 Apr 24;4:14. doi: 10.18332/tpc/89624. eCollection 2018.
5
A Process Evaluation of a Web-Based Mental Health Portal (WalkAlong) Using Google Analytics.一项使用谷歌分析对基于网络的心理健康门户网站(WalkAlong)进行的过程评估。
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Aug 20;5(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/mental.8594.
6
A Human-Centered Platform for HIV Infection Reduction in New York: Development and Usage Analysis of the Ending the Epidemic (ETE) Dashboard.纽约一个以人类为中心的减少艾滋病毒感染平台:终结疫情(ETE)仪表盘的开发与使用分析
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017 Dec 11;3(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/publichealth.8312.
如何增加心理健康政策中证据的使用?一项系统综述。
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 Aug 1;66(8):783-97. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400329. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Supporting Policy In health with Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT)-protocol for a stepped wedge trial.支持健康研究政策:一项阶梯式楔形试验的干预试验(SPIRIT)方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 1;4(7):e005293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005293.
5
Measuring use of research evidence in public health policy: a policy content analysis.衡量公共卫生政策中研究证据的应用:一项政策内容分析。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 23;14:496. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-496.
6
A narrative review of recent developments in knowledge translation and implications for mental health care providers.知识转化的最新发展述评及其对精神健康照护提供者的影响。
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;59(3):160-9. doi: 10.1177/070674371405900308.
7
A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.政策制定者使用证据的障碍与促进因素的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 3;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
8
What supports do health system organizations have in place to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making? A qualitative study.卫生系统组织有哪些支持措施来促进循证决策?一项定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 6;8:84. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-84.
9
Research-policy partnerships - experiences of the Mental Health and Poverty Project in Ghana, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia.研究政策伙伴关系——加纳、南非、乌干达和赞比亚心理健康与贫困项目的经验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2012 Sep 14;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-30.
10
The effectiveness of knowledge translation strategies used in public health: a systematic review.知识转化策略在公共卫生中的有效性:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 7;12:751. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-751.