MacSweeney Mairéad, Woll Bencie, Campbell Ruth, McGuire Philip K, David Anthony S, Williams Steven C R, Suckling John, Calvert Gemma A, Brammer Michael J
BBSU, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK.
Brain. 2002 Jul;125(Pt 7):1583-93. doi: 10.1093/brain/awf153.
In order to understand the evolution of human language, it is necessary to explore the neural systems that support language processing in its many forms. In particular, it is informative to separate those mechanisms that may have evolved for sensory processing (hearing) from those that have evolved to represent events and actions symbolically (language). To what extent are the brain systems that support language processing shaped by auditory experience and to what extent by exposure to language, which may not necessarily be acoustically structured? In this first neuroimaging study of the perception of British Sign Language (BSL), we explored these questions by measuring brain activation using functional MRI in nine hearing and nine congenitally deaf native users of BSL while they performed a BSL sentence-acceptability task. Eight hearing, non-signing subjects performed an analogous task that involved audio-visual English sentences. The data support the argument that there are both modality-independent and modality-dependent language localization patterns in native users. In relation to modality-independent patterns, regions activated by both BSL in deaf signers and by spoken English in hearing non-signers included inferior prefrontal regions bilaterally (including Broca's area) and superior temporal regions bilaterally (including Wernicke's area). Lateralization patterns were similar for the two languages. There was no evidence of enhanced right-hemisphere recruitment for BSL processing in comparison with audio-visual English. In relation to modality-specific patterns, audio-visual speech in hearing subjects generated greater activation in the primary and secondary auditory cortices than BSL in deaf signers, whereas BSL generated enhanced activation in the posterior occipito-temporal regions (V5), reflecting the greater movement component of BSL. The influence of hearing status on the recruitment of sign language processing systems was explored by comparing deaf and hearing adults who had BSL as their first language (native signers). Deaf native signers demonstrated greater activation in the left superior temporal gyrus in response to BSL than hearing native signers. This important finding suggests that left- temporal auditory regions may be privileged for processing heard speech even in hearing native signers. However, in the absence of auditory input this region can be recruited for visual processing.
为了理解人类语言的演化,有必要探究支持多种形式语言处理的神经系统。特别地,将可能为感官处理(听觉)而演化的机制与为象征性地表征事件和动作(语言)而演化的机制区分开来是很有意义的。支持语言处理的脑系统在多大程度上是由听觉经验塑造的,又在多大程度上是由接触语言(不一定是声学结构的语言)塑造的?在这项关于英国手语(BSL)感知的首次神经影像学研究中,我们通过功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量了9名听力正常的和9名先天性失聪的BSL母语使用者在执行BSL句子可接受性任务时的脑激活情况,以此来探究这些问题。8名听力正常但不使用手语的受试者执行了一项类似的任务,该任务涉及视听英语句子。数据支持了这样一种观点,即母语使用者中存在与模态无关和与模态相关的语言定位模式。关于与模态无关的模式,聋人手语使用者的BSL和听力正常但不使用手语者的英语口语所激活的区域包括双侧额下区域(包括布洛卡区)和双侧颞上区域(包括韦尼克区)。两种语言的偏侧化模式相似。没有证据表明与视听英语相比,BSL处理会增强右半球的参与。关于特定模态模式,听力正常受试者的视听语音在初级和次级听觉皮层中产生的激活比聋人手语使用者的BSL更大,而BSL在枕颞后部区域(V5)产生增强的激活,这反映了BSL中更大的动作成分。通过比较以BSL为第一语言的聋人和听力正常的成年人(母语手语使用者),探究了听力状况对手语处理系统招募的影响。聋人母语手语使用者对BSL的反应在左颞上回表现出比听力正常的母语手语使用者更大的激活。这一重要发现表明,即使在听力正常的母语手语使用者中,左颞听觉区域在处理听到的语音方面可能具有优势。然而,在没有听觉输入的情况下,该区域可被用于视觉处理。