Nematova Shakhlo, Zinszer Benjamin, Morlet Thierry, Morini Giovanna, Petitto Laura-Ann, Jasińska Kaja K
Department of Linguistics and Cognitive Science, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA, USA.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Jun 14;5(2):553-588. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00143. eCollection 2024.
We examined the impact of exposure to a signed language (American Sign Language, or ASL) at different ages on the neural systems that support spoken language phonemic discrimination in deaf individuals with cochlear implants (CIs). Deaf CI users ( = 18, age = 18-24 yrs) who were exposed to a signed language at different ages and hearing individuals ( = 18, age = 18-21 yrs) completed a phonemic discrimination task in a spoken native (English) and non-native (Hindi) language while undergoing functional near-infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging. Behaviorally, deaf CI users who received a CI early versus later in life showed better English phonemic discrimination, albeit phonemic discrimination was poor relative to hearing individuals. Importantly, the age of exposure to ASL was not related to phonemic discrimination. Neurally, early-life language exposure, irrespective of modality, was associated with greater neural activation of left-hemisphere language areas critically involved in phonological processing during the phonemic discrimination task in deaf CI users. In particular, early exposure to ASL was associated with increased activation in the left hemisphere's classic language regions for native versus non-native language phonemic contrasts for deaf CI users who received a CI later in life. For deaf CI users who received a CI early in life, the age of exposure to ASL was not related to neural activation during phonemic discrimination. Together, the findings suggest that early signed language exposure does not negatively impact spoken language processing in deaf CI users, but may instead potentially offset the negative effects of language deprivation that deaf children without any signed language exposure experience prior to implantation. This empirical evidence aligns with and lends support to recent perspectives regarding the impact of ASL exposure in the context of CI usage.
我们研究了在不同年龄接触手语(美国手语,即ASL)对使用人工耳蜗(CI)的聋人支持口语音位辨别能力的神经系统的影响。在不同年龄接触过手语的聋人人工耳蜗使用者(n = 18,年龄 = 18 - 24岁)和听力正常的人(n = 18,年龄 = 18 - 21岁)在进行功能性近红外光谱神经成像时,完成了一项用母语(英语)和非母语(印地语)进行的音位辨别任务。在行为方面,早年接受人工耳蜗植入的聋人人工耳蜗使用者与晚年接受植入的相比,表现出更好的英语音位辨别能力,尽管相对于听力正常的人,他们的音位辨别能力较差。重要的是,接触美国手语的年龄与音位辨别能力无关。在神经层面,早年的语言接触,无论其方式如何,都与聋人人工耳蜗使用者在音位辨别任务中左半球语言区域更强的神经激活有关,这些区域在语音处理中起着关键作用。特别是,对于晚年接受人工耳蜗植入的聋人人工耳蜗使用者,早期接触美国手语与左半球经典语言区域在母语与非母语音位对比时的激活增加有关。对于早年接受人工耳蜗植入的聋人人工耳蜗使用者,接触美国手语的年龄与音位辨别过程中的神经激活无关。总之,研究结果表明,早期接触手语不会对聋人人工耳蜗使用者的口语处理产生负面影响,反而可能抵消植入前未接触任何手语的聋童所经历的语言剥夺的负面影响。这一实证证据与近期关于在人工耳蜗使用背景下接触美国手语影响的观点一致,并为其提供了支持。