• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

专业人员参与自助团体的维度与预测:内部视角

Dimensions and predictions of professional involvement in self-help groups: a view from within.

作者信息

Ben-Ari Adital Tirosh

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Israel.

出版信息

Health Soc Work. 2002 May;27(2):95-103. doi: 10.1093/hsw/27.2.95.

DOI:10.1093/hsw/27.2.95
PMID:12079173
Abstract

This article focuses on an analysis of how members of self-help groups perceived professional involvement and what they defined as the dimensions of such involvement. Models to predict these identified dimensions are also suggested. The instrument developed for the study consisted of two parts: (1) demographic question and (2) 12 statements concerning self-help group members' attitudes toward professional involvement. Based on responses from 183 members of self-help groups, three categories were identfied according to their main focus: groups dealing with health issues, groups dealing with alternative lifestyles, and groups based on the 12-step model. Analysis yielded two conceptually different constructs influencing group members' attitudes: collaboration and duality.

摘要

本文着重分析自助团体成员如何看待专业人员的参与以及他们将这种参与的维度定义为什么。还提出了预测这些已确定维度的模型。为该研究开发的工具包括两个部分:(1)人口统计学问题,以及(2)关于自助团体成员对专业人员参与态度的12条陈述。根据183名自助团体成员的回答,根据其主要关注点确定了三类:处理健康问题的团体、处理另类生活方式的团体以及基于12步模式的团体。分析得出影响团体成员态度的两个概念上不同的结构:协作和二元性。

相似文献

1
Dimensions and predictions of professional involvement in self-help groups: a view from within.专业人员参与自助团体的维度与预测:内部视角
Health Soc Work. 2002 May;27(2):95-103. doi: 10.1093/hsw/27.2.95.
2
Self-help groups: the members' perspectives.自助小组:成员的观点
Am J Community Psychol. 1980 Feb;8(1):53-65. doi: 10.1007/BF00892281.
3
The professional connection with self-help groups in health care settings.在医疗保健环境中与自助团体的专业联系。
Soc Work Health Care. 1983 Summer;8(4):69-77. doi: 10.1300/J010v08n04_06.
4
Self-help groups and the family service agency.
Soc Casework. 1988 Feb;69(2):74-80.
5
Mutual-help groups: members' views of their benefits and of roles for professionals.互助小组:成员对其益处及专业人员角色的看法
Prev Hum Serv. 1982 Spring;1(3):55-67. doi: 10.1300/J293v01n03_06.
6
Professionals in mutual help groups: impact on social climate and members' behavior.互助小组中的专业人员:对社会氛围和成员行为的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Aug;56(4):631-2. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.4.631.
7
The Spanish Psoriasis Patients' Association According to Its Members: Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study of Members' Opinions of the Association's Functions.西班牙银屑病患者协会会员视角:协会功能会员意见的横断面描述性研究
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016 Nov;107(9):751-757. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
8
Cancer self-help groups are here to stay: issues and challenges for health professionals.
J Palliat Care. 2001 Spring;17(1):53-8.
9
The impact of visit frequency on the relationship between service quality and outpatient satisfaction: a South Korean study.就诊频率对服务质量与门诊患者满意度关系的影响:一项韩国研究。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Feb;39(1):13-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00213.x.
10
Use of self-help services and consumer satisfaction with professional mental health services.自助服务的使用以及消费者对专业心理健康服务的满意度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2003 Aug;54(8):1161-3. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.8.1161.

引用本文的文献

1
Referral to consumer-run programs by mental health providers: a national survey.心理健康服务提供者向消费者主导项目的转诊:一项全国性调查。
Community Ment Health J. 2007 Jun;43(3):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10597-006-9079-y. Epub 2007 Jan 19.