Aletaha D, Eberl G, Nell V P K, Machold K P, Smolen J S
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Vienna, Austria.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Jul;61(7):630-4. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.7.630.
Early diagnosis and treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been advocated for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This survey focuses on the individual definitions and treatment modalities of rheumatologists, and aims at determining the practical realisation of these concepts.
A questionnaire to be self completed was handed out at the EULAR Symposium 1997. The main issues dealt with were definition, referral time, diagnosis, follow up, and treatment of early RA. Of the 111 participants, who were from all continents and all age groups, 85 (77%) gave their name and address. In 2000, the same questionnaire was sent to these 85 primary respondents. Forty four questionnaires (52%) were returned, and their results were matched and further evaluated.
The definition of early RA was heterogeneous, but two of three rheumatologists use the term "early" for symptoms shorter than three months. There was a drift towards acceptance of involvement of fewer affected joints. Serological tests obtained for early diagnosis were mostly rheumatoid factor and antinuclear antibodies, usually in combination (approximately 70%), while other tests (antikeratin antibodies, antiperinuclear factor, anti-RA33) were used rarely, but increasingly (21-25% all together). No significant change in the lag time of referral to the specialist of patients with suspected early RA was seen within these three years (<3 months for 50%, >6 months for 20%), while the proportion followed up during the first three months increased. At both times, every second rheumatologist started DMARD treatment only when the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria were fulfilled. However, in 1997 about 10% were willing to wait for erosions before starting DMARDs, while none did so in 2000. Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, and antimalarial drugs were the most commonly prescribed DMARDs in early RA, with the first two of these still being in increasing use.
The understanding of "early" rheumatoid arthritis is heterogeneous, but the vast majority of the rheumatologists surveyed regard symptom duration of <3 months as early. Rheumatoid factor was the most useful laboratory support in early diagnosis. Because there has been no shortening of referral time of patients with new RA within the past three years, and many rheumatologists start DMARDs only when the ACR criteria are fulfilled, it is concluded that guidelines for early referral, as well as for early (rheumatoid) arthritis, are needed.
对于类风湿关节炎(RA)患者,一直提倡使用改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)进行早期诊断和治疗。本次调查聚焦于风湿病学家的个体定义和治疗方式,旨在确定这些概念的实际落实情况。
一份自填式问卷在1997年欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)研讨会上发放。主要涉及的问题包括早期RA的定义、转诊时间、诊断、随访及治疗。111名来自各大洲、各年龄组的参与者中,85人(77%)提供了姓名和地址。2000年,同样的问卷被发送给这85名主要受访者。44份问卷(52%)被返还,其结果进行了匹配并进一步评估。
早期RA的定义存在差异,但三位风湿病学家中有两位将症状出现时间短于三个月的情况称为“早期”。对于受累关节数量较少的情况,接受度有所上升。用于早期诊断的血清学检测主要是类风湿因子和抗核抗体,通常联合使用(约70%),而其他检测(抗角蛋白抗体、抗核周因子、抗RA33)很少使用,但使用频率在增加(总共21 - 25%)。在这三年中,疑似早期RA患者转诊至专科医生的延迟时间没有显著变化(50%小于3个月,20%大于6个月),而在前三个月接受随访的比例有所增加。两次调查时,每两位风湿病学家中就有一位仅在符合1987年美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准时才开始使用DMARD治疗。然而,1997年约10%的人愿意在出现骨侵蚀后再开始使用DMARDs,而2000年没有人这样做。甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和抗疟药是早期RA中最常用的DMARDs,前两种药物的使用仍在增加。
对“早期”类风湿关节炎的理解存在差异,但绝大多数接受调查的风湿病学家将症状持续时间小于3个月视为早期。类风湿因子是早期诊断中最有用的实验室检查依据。由于在过去三年中,新发RA患者的转诊时间没有缩短,而且许多风湿病学家仅在符合ACR标准时才开始使用DMARDs,因此得出结论,需要制定早期转诊以及早期(类风湿)关节炎的指南。