Lane Andrew M, Lane Helen, Firth Susan
School of Performing Arts and Leisure, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall, UK.
Percept Mot Skills. 2002 Jun;94(3 Pt 1):805-13. doi: 10.2466/pms.2002.94.3.805.
This study examined the influence of postcompetition depressed mood on the intensity of other mood dimensions assessed by the Profile of Mood States and relationships between mood and satisfaction with performance. 195 distance runners completed the Brunel Mood Scale which is a 24-item measure assessing anger, confusion, depression, fatigue, tension, and vigor, and a Performance Satisfaction questionnaire immediately after running a 10-mi. race. To examine the proposed moderating effect of depression, participants were separated into a No-depression group of 133 and a Depressed Mood group of 62. Multivariate analysis of variance indicated that the Depressed Mood group reported significantly higher scores on Anger, Contusion, Fatigue, and Tension and lower Vigor scores than the No-depression group t ratios indicated that poorer performance was associated with higher Depression scores. Standard multiple regression to predict Performance Satisfaction scores from postcompetition scores on Anger, Confusion, Fatigue, Tension, and Vigor in the No-depression group indicated that only 1% (Adj. R2=.01, p>.05) of the variance was explained. By contrast, in the Depressed Mood group, the same mood dimensions predicted 27.5% of the variance in Performance Satisfaction scores (Adj. R2=.275, p<.01) with Anger (Beta=.63, p<.001), and Confusion (Beta=.44, p<.05) being significant predictors. Present findings support the notion that depressed mood is related to the intensity of other mood dimensions assessed by the Profile of Mood States and moderates relationships between those scores and performance satisfaction.
本研究考察了赛后抑郁情绪对通过情绪状态剖面图评估的其他情绪维度强度的影响,以及情绪与对表现的满意度之间的关系。195名长跑运动员在跑完10英里比赛后,立即完成了布鲁内尔情绪量表(这是一项评估愤怒、困惑、抑郁、疲劳、紧张和活力的24项测量工具)和一份表现满意度问卷。为了检验所提出的抑郁调节效应,参与者被分为133人的非抑郁组和62人的抑郁情绪组。多变量方差分析表明,抑郁情绪组在愤怒、挫伤、疲劳和紧张方面的得分显著高于非抑郁组,而活力得分则低于非抑郁组。t比率表明,较差的表现与较高的抑郁得分相关。在非抑郁组中,用赛后愤怒、困惑、疲劳、紧张和活力得分预测表现满意度得分的标准多元回归表明,只有1%的方差得到了解释(调整后R² = 0.01,p > 0.05)。相比之下,在抑郁情绪组中,相同的情绪维度预测了表现满意度得分中27.5%的方差(调整后R² = 0.275,p < 0.01),愤怒(β = 0.63,p < 0.001)和困惑(β = 0.44,p < 0.05)是显著的预测因素。目前的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即抑郁情绪与通过情绪状态剖面图评估的其他情绪维度的强度有关,并调节这些得分与表现满意度之间的关系。