Suppr超能文献

健康受试者中粒细胞集落刺激因子诱导的粒细胞动员动力学:给药途径及地塞米松添加的影响

Kinetics of G-CSF-induced granulocyte mobilization in healthy subjects: effects of route of administration and addition of dexamethasone.

作者信息

Stroncek David F, Matthews Cynthia L, Follmann Dean, Leitman Susan F

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1184, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2002 May;42(5):597-602. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2002.00091.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte donors are frequently given G-CSF with or without dexamethasone approximately 18 hours before apheresis to increase cell yields. The purpose of this study was to assess the kinetics of G-CSF plus dexamethasone neutrophil mobilization to determine whether the neutrophils can be mobilized and collected the same day.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Sixteen subjects were given four separate mobilization regimens: IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg), subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg), IV G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg), and subcutaneous G-CSF (5 microg/kg) plus oral dexamethasone (8 mg). Blood cell counts were measured before and after G-CSF administration.

RESULTS

Following all four mobilization regimens, neutrophil counts fell 0.5 hour after the mobilizing agents were given, rose above baseline levels at Hour 2, and increased further with each time interval to Hour 8. In the absence of dexamethasone at Hours 2 through 8, there was no difference in neutrophil counts by subcutaneous or IV G-CSF administration routes. The addition of dexamethasone enhanced mobilization of neutrophils from Hours 3 through 24. Through Hour 8, there was no difference in the degree of mobilization among the subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone and the IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone regimens. However, at Hour 24, neutrophil counts were sustained at higher levels with subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone than with IV G-CSF plus dexamethasone.

CONCLUSIONS

Granulocyte mobilization response to subcutaneous G-CSF plus dexamethasone is sustained at peak levels for 8 to 24 hours after coadministration of the two drugs. There was no advantage to giving G-CSF intravenously.

摘要

背景

粒细胞供者在采集前约18小时经常接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),无论是否联用 地塞米松,以提高细胞产量。本研究的目的是评估G-CSF加地塞米松动员中性粒细胞的动力学,以确定中性粒细胞是否能在同一天动员并采集。

研究设计与方法

16名受试者接受了四种不同的动员方案:静脉注射G-CSF(5微克/千克)、皮下注射G-CSF(5微克/千克)、静脉注射G-CSF(5微克/千克)加口服地塞米松(8毫克)、皮下注射G-CSF(5微克/千克)加口服地塞米松(8毫克)。在给予G-CSF之前和之后测量血细胞计数。

结果

在所有四种动员方案之后,给予动员剂0.5小时后中性粒细胞计数下降,在第2小时升至基线水平以上,并随每个时间间隔进一步增加至第8小时。在第2至8小时未使用地塞米松的情况下,皮下或静脉注射G-CSF给药途径的中性粒细胞计数没有差异。地塞米松的加入在第3至24小时增强了中性粒细胞的动员。至第8小时,皮下注射G-CSF加地塞米松和静脉注射G-CSF加地塞米松方案之间的动员程度没有差异。然而,在第24小时,皮下注射G-CSF加地塞米松的中性粒细胞计数维持在比静脉注射G-CSF加地塞米松更高的水平。

结论

皮下注射G-CSF加地塞米松后,粒细胞动员反应在两种药物联合给药后8至24小时维持在峰值水平。静脉注射G-CSF没有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验