• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的伤口并发症

Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.

作者信息

Winslow E R, Fleshman J W, Birnbaum E H, Brunt L M

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Institute for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid, Campus Box 8109, St Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1420-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8837-3. Epub 2002 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-002-8837-3
PMID:12085142
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to determine if laparoscopic colon surgery has changed the incidence of wound complications after colon resection.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic (LCR) or open colon resection (OCR) for cancer at our institution as part of a multicenter trial. Data were tabulated from review of the prospective database and physician records.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were randomized to LCR and 46 to OCR. Seven patients in the LCR group were converted to OCR. LCR was performed using a limited midline incision for anastomosis and specimen extraction. Incision length was significantly greater (p <0.001) in the OCR group (19.4 +/- 5.6 cm) compared to the LCR extraction site (6.3 +/- 1.4 cm). Wound infections occurred in 13.5% of patients after LCR (2.7% trocar, 10.8% extraction sites) and in 10.9% of patients after OCR. Over a mean follow-up period of 30.1 +/- 17.8 months, incisional hernias developed in 24.3% of patients after LCR and 17.4% after OCR. In the LCR group, extraction sites accounted for 85.7% of all wound complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The extraction site for LCR is associated with a high incidence of complications, comparable to open colectomy. Strategies to alter operative technique should be considered to reduce the incidence of these complications.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定腹腔镜结肠手术是否改变了结肠切除术后伤口并发症的发生率。

方法

作为一项多中心试验的一部分,83例因癌症在我院接受腹腔镜(LCR)或开放结肠切除术(OCR)的患者被随机分组。数据通过回顾前瞻性数据库和医生记录进行列表整理。

结果

37例患者被随机分配至LCR组,46例至OCR组。LCR组中有7例患者转为OCR手术。LCR手术采用有限的中线切口进行吻合和标本取出。与LCR取出部位(6.3±1.4 cm)相比,OCR组的切口长度明显更长(p<0.001)(19.4±5.6 cm)。LCR术后13.5%的患者发生伤口感染(2.7%为套管针部位,10.8%为取出部位),OCR术后为10.9%。在平均30.1±17.8个月的随访期内,LCR术后24.3%的患者发生切口疝,OCR术后为17.4%。在LCR组中,取出部位占所有伤口并发症的85.7%。

结论

LCR的取出部位并发症发生率较高,与开放结肠切除术相当。应考虑改变手术技术的策略以降低这些并发症的发生率。

相似文献

1
Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的伤口并发症
Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1420-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8837-3. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
2
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
3
Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial.澳大利亚随机临床试验比较腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗结肠癌的长期结果:澳大利亚腹腔镜结肠癌研究试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):915-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765ff8.
4
Implementation of laparoscopic colectomy with fast-track care in an academic medical center: benefits of a fully ascended learning curve and specialty expertise.在学术医疗中心实施快速康复腹腔镜结肠切除术:完全上升的学习曲线和专业技能的益处。
Am J Surg. 2007 Mar;193(3):413-5; discussion 415-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.09.019.
5
The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.西格玛试验方案:有症状憩室炎患者腹腔镜与开放选择性乙状结肠切除术的前瞻性双盲多中心比较
BMC Surg. 2007 Aug 3;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-16.
6
Incidence and risk factors for the development of incisional hernia following elective laparoscopic versus open colon resections.择期腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术后切口疝发生的发生率及危险因素。
Am J Surg. 2010 Aug;200(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.044. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
7
Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?对于因结肠良性或恶性疾病接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的肥胖患者,是否应考虑完全体内吻合术?
Surgery. 2006 Oct;140(4):675-82; discussion 682-3. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.013. Epub 2006 Sep 6.
8
Multimedia article. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection with colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.多媒体文章。腹腔镜超低位前切除术联合结肠J形贮袋肛管吻合术。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Nov;51(11):1710-1. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9322-4. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
9
[Right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a prospective randomised study comparing laparoscopic vs. open technique].结肠癌右半结肠切除术:一项比较腹腔镜与开放技术的前瞻性随机研究
Chir Ital. 2008 Jan-Feb;60(1):1-7.
10
Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.结肠癌开放手术与腹腔镜手术费用的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):409-17. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4469.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: technique, outcomes and role of inflammatory markers.用于憩室病的自然腔道标本取出术:技术、结果及炎症标志物的作用
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11803-4.
2
Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matched Studies.右侧结肠癌的自然腔道标本取出术:倾向评分匹配研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 May 15;17(5):e84191. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84191. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Incisional hernia incidence following laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
腹腔镜与开腹手术切口疝发生率:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 30;29(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03347-2.
4
Comparison of transvaginal or transumbilical tissue extraction at laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: A 12-year experience.腹腔镜妇科手术中经阴道或经脐组织提取的比较:12年经验
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Aug;170(2):835-843. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70050. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
5
Occurrence and prevention of incisional hernia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口疝的发生与预防
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):1973-1980. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.1973.
6
Robotic Full Lobe Hepatectomy With Natural Orifice Extraction: Case Series Describing the Novel Technique of Robotic Major Hepatectomy and Transvaginal Specimen Extraction.经自然腔道取标本的机器人辅助全肝叶切除术:描述机器人辅助肝大部切除术及经阴道标本取出新技术的病例系列报道
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Mar 16;2(1):e041. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000041. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in short-terms outcomes of middle rectal cancer.比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助自然腔道标本提取术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期疗效。
World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul 4;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03083-w.
8
Medium-term surgical outcomes and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic open colorectal cancer resection: SF-36 health survey questionnaire.腹腔镜与开放结直肠癌切除术后的中期手术结果及健康相关生活质量:SF-36健康调查问卷
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Mar 16;15(3):163-176. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i3.163.
9
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery versus conventional robotic resection for patients with colorectal neoplasms.机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术与传统机器人切除术治疗结直肠肿瘤患者的对比
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 17;13:1153751. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1153751. eCollection 2023.
10
Comparison of transabdominal wall specimen retrieval and natural orifice specimen extraction robotic surgery in the outcome of colorectal cancer treatment.经腹壁标本取出与经自然腔道标本提取机器人手术在结直肠癌治疗结局中的比较。
Front Surg. 2023 Feb 16;10:1092128. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1092128. eCollection 2023.