• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠癌开放手术与腹腔镜手术费用的随机临床试验。

Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.

作者信息

Janson M, Björholt I, Carlsson P, Haglind E, Henriksson M, Lindholm E, Anderberg B

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Centre for Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):409-17. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4469.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.4469
PMID:15048739
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been no randomized clinical trial of the costs of laparoscopic colonic resection (LCR) compared with those of open colonic resection (OCR) in the treatment of colonic cancer.

METHODS

A subset of Swedish patients included in the Colon Cancer Open Or Laparoscopic Resection (COLOR) trial was included in a prospective cost analysis; costs were calculated up to 12 weeks after surgery. All relevant costs to society were included. No effects of the procedures, such as quality of life or survival, were taken into account.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ten patients were included in the primary analysis, 98 of whom had LCR and 112 OCR. Total costs to society did not differ significantly between groups (difference in means for LCR versus OCR euro1846; P = 0.104). The cost of operation was significantly higher for LCR than for OCR (difference in means euro1171; P < 0.001), as was the cost of the first admission (difference in means euro1556; P = 0.015) and the total cost to the healthcare system (difference in means euro2244; P = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

Within 12 weeks of surgery for colonic cancer, there was no difference in total costs to society incurred by LCR and OCR. The LCR procedure, however, was more costly to the healthcare system.

摘要

背景

在结肠癌治疗中,尚未有关于腹腔镜结肠切除术(LCR)与开放结肠切除术(OCR)成本的随机临床试验。

方法

纳入结肠癌开放或腹腔镜切除术(COLOR)试验中的一部分瑞典患者进行前瞻性成本分析;计算术后12周内的成本。纳入了所有对社会的相关成本。未考虑手术的效果,如生活质量或生存率。

结果

210例患者纳入主要分析,其中98例行LCR,112例行OCR。两组间社会总成本无显著差异(LCR与OCR的均值差为1846欧元;P = 0.104)。LCR的手术成本显著高于OCR(均值差为1171欧元;P < 0.001),首次住院成本(均值差为1556欧元;P = 0.015)以及医疗系统的总成本(均值差为2244欧元;P = 0.018)也是如此。

结论

在结肠癌手术后12周内,LCR和OCR产生的社会总成本无差异。然而,LCR手术对医疗系统而言成本更高。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.结肠癌开放手术与腹腔镜手术费用的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):409-17. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4469.
2
Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.腹腔镜与开放结肠切除术的伤口并发症
Surg Endosc. 2002 Oct;16(10):1420-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8837-3. Epub 2002 Jun 27.
3
Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial.澳大利亚随机临床试验比较腹腔镜与传统开腹手术治疗结肠癌的长期结果:澳大利亚腹腔镜结肠癌研究试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):915-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182765ff8.
4
Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.在强化康复计划中比较腹腔镜手术和开放手术治疗结直肠癌的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):300-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5216.
5
Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 409-417).结肠癌开放手术与腹腔镜手术费用的随机临床试验(《英国外科杂志》2004年;91卷:409 - 417页)
Br J Surg. 2004 Sep;91(9):1202. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4818.
6
Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌:一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2418-25. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9895-0. Epub 2008 Apr 5.
7
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.腹腔镜与开腹左半结肠切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094.
8
Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy versus standard laparoscopic colectomy: a cost analysis.手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术与标准腹腔镜结肠切除术:成本分析
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jun;11(5):496-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01647.x. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
9
Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.直肠癌患者的腹腔镜切除术:疗效及成本效益分析
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Apr;50(4):464-71. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5.
10
Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open mesh hernia operation: results of a Department of Veterans Affairs randomized clinical trial.腹腔镜与开放网片疝修补手术的成本效益:退伍军人事务部随机临床试验的结果
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Oct;203(4):447-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.05.019. Epub 2006 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Reconsideration of the Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Cancer.重新审视腹腔镜直肠癌手术的安全性
Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Oct;35(5):229-237. doi: 10.3393/ac.2019.10.16. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
Effects of laparoscopic vs open abdominal surgery on costs and hospital readmission rate and its effect modification by surgeons' case volume.腹腔镜与开腹手术对成本和住院再入院率的影响及其对外科医生手术量的影响修正。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07222-x. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes: a single-center and retrospective analysis.
内镜手术技能资格认证系统在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用价值:短期疗效:单中心回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0528-2.
4
Staplers vs. loop-ligature: a cost analysis from the hospital payer perspective.订书机与环扎线:从医院支付方角度的成本分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Oct;33(10):3419-3424. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06639-0. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
5
Advances and challenges in laparoscopic surgery in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma.腹腔镜手术治疗肝细胞癌的进展与挑战
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec 27;9(12):233-245. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i12.233.
6
Induced Bias Due to Crossover Within Randomized Controlled Trials in Surgical Oncology: A Meta-regression Analysis of Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer.随机对照试验中交叉引起的偏倚:微创手术与开放性手术治疗胃肠道癌的荟萃回归分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):221-230. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6210-y. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Assessing the economic advantage of laparoscopic vs. open approaches for colorectal cancer by a propensity score matching analysis.通过倾向评分匹配分析评估腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的经济优势。
Surg Today. 2018 Apr;48(4):439-448. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1606-7. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
8
Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).美国结直肠外科医师协会(ASCRS)和美国胃肠与内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)发布的结直肠手术后加速康复临床实践指南。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3412-3436. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5722-7. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
A critical appraisal of the cost effectiveness of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for oncological and non-oncological resections.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术用于肿瘤性和非肿瘤性切除的成本效益的批判性评估。
Updates Surg. 2017 Sep;69(3):339-344. doi: 10.1007/s13304-017-0458-4. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Heated insufflation with or without humidification for laparoscopic abdominal surgery.用于腹腔镜腹部手术的带或不带加湿的热吹入法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 19;10(10):CD007821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007821.pub3.