Lieberman Judy, Manjunath N, Shankar Premlata
Center for Blood Research and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, 800 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Curr Opin Immunol. 2002 Aug;14(4):478-86. doi: 10.1016/s0952-7915(02)00366-7.
Virus-specific CD8 T cells during chronic infection often exceed in numbers virus-replicating infected cells. Why then do antiviral CD8 T cells not do a better job of controlling infection? Although viral strategies for immune evasion are well known, this review will focus on changes in the CD8 T cell that interfere with cytolytic function. Most antiviral CD8 T cells in chronic infection do not express perforin, a molecule that is required for cytolysis. IL-2 and other costimulatory signals can restore cytotoxicity that has been impaired, suggesting a role for CD4 T cell anergy. The chance to eradicate an infection by T cell mediated lysis is undermined after an infection becomes established, in part because the effector immune response is impaired in the setting of chronic antigen.
在慢性感染期间,病毒特异性CD8 T细胞的数量常常超过进行病毒复制的受感染细胞。那么,抗病毒CD8 T细胞为何不能更好地控制感染呢?尽管病毒的免疫逃逸策略已广为人知,但本综述将聚焦于CD8 T细胞中干扰细胞溶解功能的变化。慢性感染中的大多数抗病毒CD8 T细胞不表达穿孔素,而穿孔素是细胞溶解所必需的分子。白细胞介素-2和其他共刺激信号可恢复受损的细胞毒性,这表明CD4 T细胞无反应性发挥了作用。感染确立后,通过T细胞介导的裂解来根除感染的机会就会受到破坏,部分原因是在慢性抗原环境下效应免疫反应受损。