Zaroff Jonathan G, diTommaso Dante G, Barron Hal V
Department ofFrom the Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94117-0124, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jul 1;90(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02375-5.
The mortality risk associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. Although elective CABG is quite safe, the effects of recent myocardial infarction, gender, and other clinical factors on perioperative mortality rates are not completely understood. The objective of this study was to determine in-hospital mortality rates for patients with AMI receiving CABG and to generate a model to predict the risk for any individual patient with specific risk factors. Using the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 database, we identified 71,774 subjects (21,270 women) with AMI who underwent CABG; we excluded those subjects who received immediate surgery as reperfusion therapy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify the independent effects of age, recent myocardial infarction, gender, and other covariates on mortality. A risk score was then generated from the regression model to quantify the mortality risk. The results of logistic regression modeling determined that age was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.76 to 3.37 for age >75), as were previous CABG (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.55 to 3.16), heart failure on presentation (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.91 for Killip class II), and female gender (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.71). The mortality risk score showed that 55% of patients had risk scores of 2 to 5 and mortality rates of 4% to 13%. This moderate risk group experienced 76% of the total predicted mortality. Thus, in-hospital CABG mortality rates after AMI are high compared with elective surgery. Using the described risk score, clinicians can quantify the impact of patient risk factors in making decisions about referral for and timing of CABG.
急性心肌梗死(AMI)后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的死亡风险仍存在争议。虽然择期CABG相当安全,但近期心肌梗死、性别及其他临床因素对围手术期死亡率的影响尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是确定接受CABG的AMI患者的院内死亡率,并建立一个模型来预测具有特定危险因素的任何个体患者的风险。利用国家心肌梗死注册2数据库,我们识别出71774例接受CABG的AMI患者(21270例女性);我们排除了那些接受即刻手术作为再灌注治疗的患者。采用多因素逻辑回归来量化年龄、近期心肌梗死、性别及其他协变量对死亡率的独立影响。然后从回归模型中生成一个风险评分来量化死亡风险。逻辑回归建模结果确定,年龄是院内死亡的独立预测因素(年龄>75岁时,调整后的比值比[OR]为3.05,95%置信区间[CI]为2.76至3.37),既往CABG(OR为2.84,95%CI为2.55至3.16)、就诊时心力衰竭(Killip II级时,OR为1.73,95%CI为1.57至1.91)及女性(OR为1.58,95%CI为1.45至1.71)也是如此。死亡风险评分显示,55%的患者风险评分为2至5,死亡率为4%至13%。这个中度风险组经历了总预测死亡率的76%。因此,与择期手术相比,AMI后院内CABG死亡率较高。使用所描述的风险评分,临床医生可以在决定CABG转诊和时机时量化患者危险因素的影响。