• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种源自心肌梗死国家注册数据库2的风险模型,用于预测急性心肌梗死期间冠状动脉旁路移植术后的死亡率。

A risk model derived from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 database for predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting during acute myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Zaroff Jonathan G, diTommaso Dante G, Barron Hal V

机构信息

Department ofFrom the Department of Medicine (Cardiology), University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94117-0124, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jul 1;90(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02375-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02375-5
PMID:12088769
Abstract

The mortality risk associated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains controversial. Although elective CABG is quite safe, the effects of recent myocardial infarction, gender, and other clinical factors on perioperative mortality rates are not completely understood. The objective of this study was to determine in-hospital mortality rates for patients with AMI receiving CABG and to generate a model to predict the risk for any individual patient with specific risk factors. Using the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 database, we identified 71,774 subjects (21,270 women) with AMI who underwent CABG; we excluded those subjects who received immediate surgery as reperfusion therapy. Multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify the independent effects of age, recent myocardial infarction, gender, and other covariates on mortality. A risk score was then generated from the regression model to quantify the mortality risk. The results of logistic regression modeling determined that age was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.76 to 3.37 for age >75), as were previous CABG (OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.55 to 3.16), heart failure on presentation (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.91 for Killip class II), and female gender (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.71). The mortality risk score showed that 55% of patients had risk scores of 2 to 5 and mortality rates of 4% to 13%. This moderate risk group experienced 76% of the total predicted mortality. Thus, in-hospital CABG mortality rates after AMI are high compared with elective surgery. Using the described risk score, clinicians can quantify the impact of patient risk factors in making decisions about referral for and timing of CABG.

摘要

急性心肌梗死(AMI)后冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的死亡风险仍存在争议。虽然择期CABG相当安全,但近期心肌梗死、性别及其他临床因素对围手术期死亡率的影响尚未完全明确。本研究的目的是确定接受CABG的AMI患者的院内死亡率,并建立一个模型来预测具有特定危险因素的任何个体患者的风险。利用国家心肌梗死注册2数据库,我们识别出71774例接受CABG的AMI患者(21270例女性);我们排除了那些接受即刻手术作为再灌注治疗的患者。采用多因素逻辑回归来量化年龄、近期心肌梗死、性别及其他协变量对死亡率的独立影响。然后从回归模型中生成一个风险评分来量化死亡风险。逻辑回归建模结果确定,年龄是院内死亡的独立预测因素(年龄>75岁时,调整后的比值比[OR]为3.05,95%置信区间[CI]为2.76至3.37),既往CABG(OR为2.84,95%CI为2.55至3.16)、就诊时心力衰竭(Killip II级时,OR为1.73,95%CI为1.57至1.91)及女性(OR为1.58,95%CI为1.45至1.71)也是如此。死亡风险评分显示,55%的患者风险评分为2至5,死亡率为4%至13%。这个中度风险组经历了总预测死亡率的76%。因此,与择期手术相比,AMI后院内CABG死亡率较高。使用所描述的风险评分,临床医生可以在决定CABG转诊和时机时量化患者危险因素的影响。

相似文献

1
A risk model derived from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 database for predicting mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting during acute myocardial infarction.一种源自心肌梗死国家注册数据库2的风险模型,用于预测急性心肌梗死期间冠状动脉旁路移植术后的死亡率。
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Jul 1;90(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02375-5.
2
Timing of in-hospital coronary artery bypass graft surgery for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients results from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry ACTION Registry-GWTG (Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines).非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间冠状动脉旁路移植术的时间来自国家心血管数据注册中心 ACTION 注册研究-GWTG(急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结局网络注册研究-遵循指南)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Apr;3(4):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.01.012.
3
Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉搭桥术的最佳时机:对加利福尼亚出院数据的回顾
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Mar;135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.10.042. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
4
Reperfusion therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-2).急性心肌梗死合并既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的再灌注治疗(心肌梗死全国注册研究-2)
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Dec 1;84(11):1287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00559-7.
5
Outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and unresponsive neurological state: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.心肌梗死、心源性休克和无反应性神经状态患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术后的结局:胸外科医师学会数据库分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Oct 1;54(4):710-716. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy114.
6
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Data From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.接受冠状动脉搭桥手术的心肌梗死和心源性休克患者的临床特征及预后:来自胸外科医师协会国家数据库的数据
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):558-66. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.10.051. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的临床特征和早期死亡率:来自澳大利亚和新西兰心脏与胸外科医师协会(ASCTS)和墨尔本介入治疗组(MIG)登记处的见解。
Heart Lung Circ. 2009 Jun;18(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
8
Optimal Timing From Myocardial Infarction to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting on Hospital Mortality.心肌梗死至冠状动脉旁路移植术的最佳时机对医院死亡率的影响
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):162-171. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.116. Epub 2016 Aug 25.
9
On-Pump Beating Heart Versus Conventional Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Early After Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis From the ANZSCTS Database.在心肌梗死后早期行体外循环跳动心脏与常规冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较:来自澳大利亚和新西兰胸外科医师学会数据库的倾向评分匹配分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Aug;28(8):1267-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.06.1051. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
10
Early versus delayed coronary artery bypass graft surgery for patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期与延迟冠状动脉旁路移植手术
Coron Artery Dis. 2017 Dec;28(8):670-674. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000537.

引用本文的文献

1
Timing of coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction: does it influence outcomes?急性心肌梗死后冠状动脉旁路移植术的时机:它会影响预后吗?
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2021 Mar;18(1):27-32. doi: 10.5114/kitp.2021.105184. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
Current outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence from real world practice.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术的当前疗效:来自真实世界实践的证据。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Nov;8(Suppl 10):S772-S786. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.10.102.
3
On-pump beating heart coronary revascularization: Is it valid for emergency revascularization?
体外循环下不停跳冠状动脉血运重建:它对急诊血运重建有效吗?
Ann Saudi Med. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):133-7. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.133.
4
Optimal coronary artery bypass grafting strategy for acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征的最佳冠状动脉搭桥手术策略
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jun;62(6):357-63. doi: 10.1007/s11748-013-0358-6. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
5
[Coronary artery bypass surgery for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes].冠状动脉搭桥手术治疗急性冠状动脉综合征
Herz. 2010 Mar;35(2):70-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-010-3327-1.
6
Timing of bypass surgery in stable patients after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后稳定患者搭桥手术的时机选择。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Oct;23(12):976-82. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70860-7.