Kim Dae Woo, Kil Ho Yeong, White Paul F
Department of Anesthesiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Jun;14(4):241-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00348-3.
To assess the relationship between clinical endpoints for induction of anesthesia and the electroencephalographic (EEG) bispectral index (BIS) and effect-site concentration (C(E)) values when using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of either thiopental sodium or propofol, by hypothesizing that yawning may be a useful alternative to other commonly used clinical signs for determining loss of consciousness.
Randomized observational clinical study.
Operating room of a university-based hospital.
60 healthy adult patients (aged 20-50 yrs) scheduled for elective surgery with general anesthesia.
During a TCI of propofol (n = 30) or thiopental (n = 30), clinical endpoints for loss of verbal responsiveness (LOV), loss-of-eyelash reflex (LOE), occurrence of yawning, and apnea were assessed at 15-second intervals. In addition, BIS and C(E) values were recorded at each of the endpoints.
In both anesthetic groups, the sequence of occurrence of the clinical endpoints was similar, namely LOV, LOE, yawning, and, lastly, apnea. Compared with LOV and LOE, yawning was associated with lower BIS and higher C(E) values with both anesthetics. The frequency of yawning was higher with thiopental than propofol (83% vs. 63%, respectively). However, the frequency of apnea was higher with propofol than thiopental (77% vs. 53%, respectively).
The correlation of the clinical endpoints with BIS and C(E) values was highest for LOV. Yawning was as unreliable as LOE for determining the onset of unconsciousness during induction of anesthesia. This clinical sign failed to be observed in 17% and 37% of patients induced with thiopental and propofol, respectively.
通过假设打哈欠可能是确定意识丧失的一种有用替代方法,以取代其他常用临床体征,来评估使用硫喷妥钠或丙泊酚靶控输注(TCI)时麻醉诱导的临床终点与脑电图(EEG)双谱指数(BIS)及效应室浓度(C(E))值之间的关系。
随机观察性临床研究。
一所大学附属医院的手术室。
60例计划接受全身麻醉择期手术的健康成年患者(年龄20 - 50岁)。
在丙泊酚(n = 30)或硫喷妥钠(n = 30)的TCI过程中,每隔15秒评估言语反应丧失(LOV)、睫毛反射消失(LOE)、打哈欠的出现及呼吸暂停等麻醉诱导的临床终点。此外,在每个终点记录BIS和C(E)值。
在两个麻醉组中,临床终点的出现顺序相似,即LOV、LOE、打哈欠,最后是呼吸暂停。与LOV和LOE相比,两种麻醉药在打哈欠时BIS值较低而C(E)值较高。硫喷妥钠组打哈欠的频率高于丙泊酚组(分别为83%和63%)。然而,丙泊酚组呼吸暂停的频率高于硫喷妥钠组(分别为77%和53%)。
临床终点与BIS和C(E)值的相关性在LOV时最高。在麻醉诱导期间,打哈欠对于确定意识丧失的可靠性与LOE一样不可靠。分别有17%和37%接受硫喷妥钠和丙泊酚诱导的患者未观察到这一临床体征。