• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[影响切口疝发生的因素。对2983例剖腹手术患者进行10年的回顾性研究]

[Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years].

作者信息

Höer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V

机构信息

Chirurgische Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2002 May;73(5):474-80. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0425-5.

DOI:10.1007/s00104-002-0425-5
PMID:12089832
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Incisional hernia formation is one of the most frequent complications in visceral surgery requiring reoperation. Risk factors for incisional hernia formation and preventive strategies are not clearly defined.

METHODS

In a retrospective study including 2983 patients over a 10-year period, the influence of demographic data, pre-, intra- and postoperative risk factors for incisional hernia development were evaluated. From the subgroups medical history, medication, laboratory values, indication, surgical technique, course of operation, postoperative course and wound healing, altogether 43 parameters were analysed. Statistical evaluation was performed using the chi 2-test according to Pearson, and binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean incisional hernia incidence in the study was 4.3%. In the mean follow-up period of 21.1 months, the incisional hernia incidence was calculated at 9.8% using the Kaplan-Meier estimate; for a 10-year period it reached 18.7%. The study revealed that 31.5% of all incisional hernias developed in the first 6 months after the operation, 54.4% after 12 months, 74.8% after 2 years and 88.9% after 5 years. Significant demographic factors influencing incisional hernia incidence were age (> 45 years) and male gender. The preoperative factors anaemia (Hb < 100 g/l) and BMI > 25, the intraoperative factors recurrent incision and previous laparotomy, and the postoperative factors catecholamin-therapy and disturbed wound healing were of significant influence.

CONCLUSION

The calculated incisional hernia incidence for a 10 year period of almost 20% and the manifestation of 50% of all hernias more than 12 months after the operation, underline the necessity to intensify surgical research in the field of laparotomy healing. In comparison to demographic and endogenous risk factors, the surgical technique has less influence on laparotomy healing. Measures to ameliorate tissue perfusin seem to exert a positive influence on incisional hernia incidence.

摘要

引言

切口疝形成是需要再次手术的内脏外科最常见的并发症之一。切口疝形成的危险因素和预防策略尚未明确界定。

方法

在一项为期10年、纳入2983例患者的回顾性研究中,评估了人口统计学数据、切口疝发生的术前、术中和术后危险因素的影响。从病史、用药情况、实验室检查值、手术指征、手术技术、手术过程、术后病程和伤口愈合等亚组中,共分析了43个参数。采用Pearson卡方检验和二元逻辑回归分析进行统计学评估。

结果

该研究中切口疝的平均发生率为4.3%。在平均21.1个月的随访期内,采用Kaplan-Meier估计法计算切口疝发生率为9.8%;10年时达到18.7%。研究显示,所有切口疝中有31.5%在术后前6个月发生,54.4%在12个月后发生,74.8%在2年后发生,88.9%在5年后发生。影响切口疝发生率的显著人口统计学因素为年龄(>45岁)和男性。术前因素贫血(血红蛋白<100g/L)和体重指数>25,术中因素切口复发和既往剖腹手术,以及术后因素儿茶酚胺治疗和伤口愈合不良均有显著影响。

结论

计算得出的10年切口疝发生率近20%,且所有疝中有50%在术后12个月以上出现,这突出了加强剖腹手术愈合领域外科研究的必要性。与人口统计学和内源性危险因素相比,手术技术对剖腹手术愈合的影响较小。改善组织灌注的措施似乎对切口疝发生率有积极影响。

相似文献

1
[Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years].[影响切口疝发生的因素。对2983例剖腹手术患者进行10年的回顾性研究]
Chirurg. 2002 May;73(5):474-80. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0425-5.
2
An evaluation of risk factors in incisional hernia recurrence.切口疝复发危险因素的评估
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;176(3):228-34.
3
Incisional hernia after repair of wound dehiscence: incidence and risk factors.伤口裂开修复术后切口疝:发病率及危险因素
Am Surg. 2004 Apr;70(4):281-6.
4
Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia.胃肠道大手术后腹壁裂开的闭合——不同手术技术的比较及切口疝的后期发展
Eur J Surg. 1999 Oct;165(10):958-61. doi: 10.1080/110241599750008071.
5
Subxiphoid incisional hernias after median sternotomy.正中胸骨切开术后剑突下切口疝
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jul;201(1):71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.01.025.
6
[Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs].[切口疝手术25年经验。432例切口疝修补术的比较性回顾研究]
Chirurg. 2003 Jul;74(7):638-45. doi: 10.1007/s00104-002-0594-2.
7
Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy.前瞻性临床试验:预测中线剖腹术后切口疝早期发生的因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.013.
8
Incidence of incisional hernia following emergency abdominal surgery.急诊腹部手术后切口疝的发生率。
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999 Aug-Sep;31(6):449-53.
9
Incidence of incisional hernias in patients operated on for aneurysm or occlusive disease.因动脉瘤或闭塞性疾病接受手术的患者发生切口疝的发生率。
Am Surg. 2004 Jun;70(6):550-2.
10
Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic material.影响使用人工材料进行切口疝修补术后复发的因素。
Eur J Surg. 2001 Nov;167(11):855-9. doi: 10.1080/11024150152717706.

引用本文的文献

1
Introducing the Mesh Integration (MINT) Index: a standardised ratio scale for assessing in vivo hernia mesh performance.介绍网状物整合(MINT)指数:一种用于评估体内疝修补网片性能的标准化比率量表。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12098-1.
2
5-year clinical outcome of the ESTOIH trial comparing the short-bite versus large-bite technique for elective midline abdominal closure.ESTOIH试验比较选择性中线腹部闭合的短咬合与大咬合技术的5年临床结果。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):263. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03459-9.
3
A proposed classification of incisional hernias after kidney transplantation.
肾移植术后切口疝的一种拟议分类。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11841-5.
4
Suture Techniques and Materials for Fascial Closure of Abdominal Wall Incisions: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.腹壁切口筋膜闭合的缝合技术与材料:一项全面的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Mar 4;6(1):e548. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000548. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Clinical importance of incisional hernia in patients resected for colorectal liver metastases: quality of life and abdominal wall symptoms.结直肠癌肝转移切除术后患者切口疝的临床重要性:生活质量和腹壁症状
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 12;410(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03638-3.
6
Risk factors for wound complications after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) compared to repeated liver resection - a propensity score matching analysis.与重复肝切除术相比,联合肝脏离断和门静脉结扎的分阶段肝切除术(ALPPS)后伤口并发症的风险因素 - 倾向评分匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Nov 13;409(1):347. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03540-4.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction in the North-West of England, UK: a three-centre retrospective cohort study.英国西北部接受腹壁重建手术的患者的社会经济不平等:一项三中心回顾性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2265-2272. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03155-0. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
8
Preoperative botolinum toxin A (BTA) and intraoperative fascial traction (IFT) in the management of complex abdominal wall hernias.术前肉毒毒素 A(BTA)和术中筋膜牵引(IFT)在复杂腹壁疝中的治疗作用。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2273-2283. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03156-z. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
9
Significance of Specimen Extraction Site in Minimizing Hernia Risk After Distal Pancreatectomy.标本提取部位对于降低远端胰腺切除术后疝风险的意义。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8688-8698. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16096-w. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
10
Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.杂交经腹补片修补术治疗切口疝:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2055-2067. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03105-w. Epub 2024 Jul 11.