• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹疝修补术的最佳教学环境

Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.

作者信息

Heniford B T, Matthews B D, Box E A, Backus C L, Kercher K W, Greene F L, Sing R F

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC 28203, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2002 Mar;6(1):17-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0045-5.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-002-0045-5
PMID:12090574
Abstract

The introduction of laparoscopic techniques after residency training has created a new paradigm dependent on laparoscopic workshops. This study tested the benefit of an animate course and evaluated the role of proctoring in learning to perform laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR). Surgeons who had taken a 1-day LVHR course (n = 59) were polled to determine previous experience with laparoscopic procedures and experience with LVHR after the course. Forty-eight (81%) surgeons completing the course responded. Thirty-two (67%) surgeons had performed 179 LVHRS (mean 5.6) since the course. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups performing and not performing LVHR regarding academic/private practice (P=0.8) or opportunities to perform a ventral herniorrhaphy (P = 0.6). Fifteen (31%) surgeons were precepted in their hospital operating room by the lead author. Thirteen (87%) of precepted surgeons had performed a LVHR compared with 19 (58%) of the 33 surgeons taking the course without a precepted intervention (P = 0.05). Surgeons with experience performing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication, and common bile duct exploration were more likely to perform LVHR (P=0.0001). Surgeons performing only laparoscopic cholecystectomy tended to be less likely to perform LVHR, nearing statistical significance (P=0.08). Surgeons with prior advanced laparoscopic surgery experience are thus more likely to perform LVHR after participating in a 1-day course. Surgeons precepted in their hospital operating room were also more likely to perform LVHR. Participation in an animate laboratory and a precepted experience can impact the future performance of advanced laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

住院医师培训后腹腔镜技术的引入创造了一种依赖腹腔镜研习班的新模式。本研究测试了一个动态课程的益处,并评估了带教在学习进行腹腔镜腹疝修补术(LVHR)中的作用。对参加过为期1天LVHR课程的外科医生(n = 59)进行了调查,以确定他们以前的腹腔镜手术经验以及课程结束后LVHR的经验。48名(81%)完成课程的外科医生进行了回复。自课程结束以来,32名(67%)外科医生进行了179例LVHR手术(平均5.6例)。在进行和未进行LVHR的两组外科医生之间,在学术/私人执业方面(P = 0.8)或进行腹疝修补术的机会方面(P = 0.6)没有统计学上的显著差异。15名(31%)外科医生在其医院手术室由第一作者进行带教。接受带教的外科医生中有13名(87%)进行了LVHR手术,而在未接受带教干预的33名参加课程的外科医生中有19名(58%)进行了LVHR手术(P = 0.05)。有腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术、nissen胃底折叠术和胆总管探查术经验的外科医生更有可能进行LVHR手术(P = 0.0001)。仅进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的外科医生进行LVHR手术的可能性往往较小,接近统计学意义(P = 0.08)。因此,有先前高级腹腔镜手术经验的外科医生在参加为期1天的课程后更有可能进行LVHR手术。在其医院手术室接受带教的外科医生也更有可能进行LVHR手术。参与动态实验室和带教经验会影响未来高级腹腔镜手术的开展。

相似文献

1
Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.腹腔镜腹疝修补术的最佳教学环境
Hernia. 2002 Mar;6(1):17-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-002-0045-5.
2
Does a one-day course influence surgeon adoption of laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy?为期一天的课程会影响外科医生采用腹腔镜腹疝修补术吗?
J Surg Res. 2007 Apr;138(2):205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.09.012. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
3
Optimal teaching environment for laparoscopic splenectomy.腹腔镜脾切除术的最佳教学环境。
Am J Surg. 2001 Mar;181(3):226-30. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(01)00558-x.
4
Outcomes of simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy and ventral hernia repair compared to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone.腹腔镜胆囊切除术同期与单纯腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗腹疝的效果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):67-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2408-z. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
5
Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后再次腹部手术的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):823-828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
6
Laparoscopic versus open ventral hernia repair in patients with chronic liver disease.慢性肝病患者腹腔镜与开放腹疝修补术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):769-777. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5031-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
A Novel University of North Carolina Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Simulator.一种新型的北卡罗来纳大学腹腔镜腹疝修补模拟器。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jun;30(6):608-611. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0770. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
8
Retrospective comparison of open versus laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair.开放性与腹腔镜下腹侧及切口疝修补术的回顾性比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014 Aug;7(3):246-50. doi: 10.1111/ases.12108. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
9
Amelioration of the effects of obesity on short-term postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repair.改善肥胖对腹腔镜和开放腹疝修补术后短期并发症的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Apr;25(2):151-7. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000100.
10
Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗原发性腹外疝的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2013 Nov;148(11):1043-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3587.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment of a urogynecology cadaver-based hands-on workshop.建立一个基于泌尿妇科尸体的实践工作坊。
Afr Health Sci. 2023 Mar;23(1):606-613. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v23i1.64.
2
Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Skills Workshop on Enhancing Knowledge and Skills of Surgical Residents and Its Comparison with DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) Scores: Prospective Cohort Study.腹腔镜技能培训工作坊对提高外科住院医师知识和技能的有效性及其与直接观察操作技能(DOPS)评分的比较:前瞻性队列研究
Med Sci Educ. 2020 May 6;30(2):861-867. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-00966-5. eCollection 2020 Jun.
3
IPOM: history of an acronym.
腹腔内补片修补术:一个首字母缩略词的历史。
Hernia. 2018 Oct;22(5):743-746. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1804-2. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
4
Outcomes of an innovative training course in laparoscopic hernia repair.腹腔镜疝修补创新培训课程的成果
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 Nov;99(8):614-616. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0094. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
5
Gynaecological laparoscopy courses in the United Arab Emirates.阿拉伯联合酋长国的妇科腹腔镜手术课程。
Afr Health Sci. 2013 Jun;13(2):393-401. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i2.28.
6
MIS in the management of colon and rectal cancer: consensus meeting of the Colorectal Cancer Association of Canada.微创外科手术在结肠癌和直肠癌治疗中的应用:加拿大结直肠癌协会共识会议
Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):3981-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3152-8. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
7
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: evaluation of an evidence-based educational strategy using a novel simulated suture and knot-tying challenge, the "holiotomy".全腹腔镜子宫切除术:使用一种新型模拟缝合和打结挑战“holiotomy”对基于证据的教育策略进行评估。
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:592970. doi: 10.1155/2012/592970. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
Mentoring and telementoring leads to effective incorporation of laparoscopic colon surgery.指导和远程指导可有效实现腹腔镜结肠手术的开展。
Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):841-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0674-1. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
9
Canadian consensus conference on the development of training and practice standards in advanced minimally invasive surgery: Edmonton, Alta., Jun. 1, 2007.加拿大高级微创手术培训与实践标准制定共识会议:阿尔伯塔省埃德蒙顿,2007年6月1日。
Can J Surg. 2009 Aug;52(4):321-327.
10
How should accredited specialists be trained to do new procedures?应该如何培训获得认证的专家来实施新的手术?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Mar;91(2):91-4. doi: 10.1308/003588409X391929.