Stoll Melissa R, Cook James L, Pope Eric R, Carson William L, Kreeger John M
Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, the Comparative Orthopaedic Laboratory, the College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Vet Surg. 2002 Jul-Aug;31(4):379-90. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2002.33596.
To develop an in vivo perineal hernia model, to develop a technique for using small intestinal submucosa (SIS) in perineal hernia repair, to further elucidate the biological behavior of SIS, and to compare SIS herniorrhaphy with the internal obturator muscle transposition (IOT) technique.
Prospective evaluation comparing SIS herniorrhaphy with IOT.
Twelve adult castrated male, large-breed dogs.
All dogs had bilateral pelvic diaphragm defects created by complete excision of the levator ani muscle. Each dog had one side repaired using SIS and the other by IOT. Pain and inflammation were subjectively scored. Dogs were killed 2 weeks (n = 4), 12 weeks (n = 4), or 16 weeks (n = 4) after surgery. Each pelvic diaphragm was biomechanically tested to failure. The pelvic diaphragms from 2 normal dogs (n = 4 sides) were also biomechanically tested. Failure site, maximum pressure, displacement at failure, and initial linear stiffness values were determined. Histologic assessment was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with significance set at P <.05
No significant postoperative complications were noted. There were no significant differences in maximum pressure to failure, displacement, or stiffness when comparing normal, SIS, and IOT at any time point. The SIS group had significantly less displacement (P =.004) at 2 weeks than at weeks 12 or 16. For all herniorrhaphy techniques, the failure site was central (n = 22) or at the suture line (n = 2). At 2 weeks, histologic evaluation of tissues from the IOT group showed inflammation, mineralization, and necrosis, which were not present in tissues from the SIS group. Histologic examination at 12 and 16 weeks showed no microscopic differences in cell population or tissue characteristics between the IOT and SIS groups.
SIS herniorrhaphy was successfully performed in this in vivo model of perineal hernia in the dog.
This study suggests that SIS can be used as a primary means of repair, as augmentation when the internal obturator muscle is thin and friable, or as a salvage procedure in cases of recurrence in dogs with perineal hernia.
建立一种体内会阴疝模型,开发一种在会阴疝修补术中使用小肠黏膜下层(SIS)的技术,进一步阐明SIS的生物学行为,并将SIS疝修补术与闭孔内肌转位(IOT)技术进行比较。
对SIS疝修补术与IOT进行前瞻性评估比较。
12只成年去势雄性大型犬。
所有犬均通过完全切除肛提肌造成双侧盆底缺损。每只犬一侧用SIS修复,另一侧用IOT修复。对疼痛和炎症进行主观评分。术后2周(n = 4)、12周(n = 4)或16周(n = 4)处死犬。对每个盆底进行生物力学测试直至破坏。对2只正常犬(n = 4侧)的盆底也进行生物力学测试。确定破坏部位、最大压力、破坏时的位移和初始线性刚度值。进行组织学评估。进行统计学分析,显著性设定为P <.05
未观察到明显的术后并发症。在任何时间点比较正常、SIS和IOT时,破坏时的最大压力、位移或刚度均无显著差异。SIS组在2周时的位移显著小于12周或16周时(P =.004)。对于所有疝修补技术,破坏部位位于中央(n = 22)或缝线处(n = 2)。在2周时,IOT组组织的组织学评估显示有炎症、矿化和坏死,而SIS组组织中不存在这些情况。在12周和16周时的组织学检查显示,IOT组和SIS组在细胞群体或组织特征方面无微观差异。
在犬的这种体内会阴疝模型中成功进行了SIS疝修补术。
本研究表明,SIS可作为主要的修复手段,在闭孔内肌薄且易碎时作为增强材料,或在犬会阴疝复发的情况下作为挽救手术。