Seamon John G, Luo Chun R, Shulman Elizabeth P, Toner Sarah K, Caglar Selin
Department of Psychology, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA.
Memory. 2002 Jul;10(4):225-37. doi: 10.1080/09658210143000344.
Directed forgetting research shows that people can inhibit the retrieval of words that they were previously instructed to forget. The present research applied the directed forgetting procedure to the Deese/Roediger and McDermott (DRM) recall task to determine if directed forgetting instructions have similar or different effects on accurate and false memory. After studying lists of semantically related words, some participants were told to forget those lists, whereas other participants were not. All participants were then shown additional lists to remember. Following study, all participants were asked to free recall as many of the studied words as possible, including those they were previously instructed to forget. Directed forgetting instructions inhibited the accurate recall of studied words, but not the false recall of nonstudied critical words, whether measured by a within-participant or between-participants design. Contrary to an implicit activation hypothesis, false memories survived instructions to forget. These findings were reviewed in terms of fuzzy trace theory and the activation/monitoring approach to false memory.
定向遗忘研究表明,人们能够抑制对先前被指示遗忘的单词的提取。本研究将定向遗忘程序应用于迪斯/罗迪格和麦克德莫特(DRM)回忆任务,以确定定向遗忘指令对准确记忆和错误记忆是否有相似或不同的影响。在学习语义相关单词列表后,一些参与者被告知忘记这些列表,而其他参与者则没有。然后向所有参与者展示其他列表以供记忆。学习之后,要求所有参与者尽可能自由回忆所学单词,包括那些他们先前被指示忘记的单词。无论采用参与者内设计还是参与者间设计,定向遗忘指令都会抑制所学单词的准确回忆,但不会抑制未学关键单词的错误回忆。与内隐激活假说相反,错误记忆在遗忘指令后依然存在。根据模糊痕迹理论和错误记忆的激活/监控方法对这些发现进行了综述。