Mezzogiorno Antonio, Mezzogiorno Vincenzo, Esposito Vincenzo
II Università degli Studi di Napoli, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Instiute of Human Anatomy, Via Luciano Armanni 5, I-80138 Naples, Italy.
Am J Nephrol. 2002 Jul;22(2-3):213-9. doi: 10.1159/000063764.
The many progressive achievements in knowledge about the structure and function of the nephron--the kidney's main morpho-functional unit--have always been influenced by philosophical theories, which for a long time have swung between vitalism and mechanism. From Galen's first imaginative vitalistic hypothesis, the scientific thought about the kidney's structure/function gradually moved to the iatro-mechanistic view promoted by Borelli, Bellini and Malpighi, to then meet Bowman's bright vitalistic-based theory. But Bowman's theory was rather soon replaced by novel yet still mechanistic theories proposed first by Ludwig and then Starling. Ludwig based his scientific approach to knowledge of renal function upon physics and chemistry; Starling eventually developed a "colloid-osmotic" theory.
关于肾单位(肾脏主要的形态功能单位)结构和功能的诸多渐进性知识成就,一直受到哲学理论的影响,长期以来这些哲学理论在活力论和机械论之间摇摆不定。从盖伦最初富有想象力的活力论假设开始,关于肾脏结构/功能的科学思想逐渐转向由博雷利、贝利尼和马尔皮基推动的医学生物机械论观点,之后又遇到了基于活力论的鲍曼的卓越理论。但鲍曼的理论很快就被路德维希首先提出、后由斯塔林进一步发展的新颖但仍属机械论的理论所取代。路德维希将其对肾功能知识的科学研究方法建立在物理和化学基础之上;斯塔林最终发展出了一种“胶体渗透压”理论。