Ng Kwok F J, Lai Kin W, Tsang Suk F
Department of Anaesthesiology, The University of Hong Kong, Room 424, Block K, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
World J Surg. 2002 May;26(5):515-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0260-8. Epub 2002 Feb 12.
In a retrospective case-control review, we evaluated preoperative coagulation testing in patients undergoing major noncardiac operations to determine if routine testing benefits this group of patients. The platelet count (PC), prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in all patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery over a 22-month period were reviewed. The review was done both manually and by the computerized hospital information system. Major surgery was defined as procedures usually associated with significant bleeding. For each patient with abnormal results, another two control patients undergoing the same surgery and matched for age and gender were identified. Case and control patients were compared regarding a change in the management plan, use of blood products, blood loss, and bleeding complications by detailed chart review. A total of 828 patients undergoing nine different surgeries were reviewed. The incidence of abnormal PCs was 2.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.2%] and that of abnormal PT/aPTTs was 2.1% (95% CI 1.1-3.1%). There were only two cases each of thrombocytopenia and prolonged PT/aPTT where the coagulation tests were not indicated clinically. Although (compared to controls) patients with abnormal tests had more changes in their anesthesia plan (36% vs. 2%, p < 0.001) and platelet or fresh frozen plasma transfusions (50% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), blood loss and the incidence of bleeding complications were not different. We conclude that the use of preoperative coagulation tests in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery should still be guided by clinical assessment. The surgical procedure itself does not constitute an indication for testing.
在一项回顾性病例对照研究中,我们评估了接受非心脏大手术患者的术前凝血功能检测,以确定常规检测是否对该组患者有益。回顾了在22个月期间接受非心脏大手术的所有患者的血小板计数(PC)、凝血酶原时间(PT)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)。回顾工作通过人工和医院计算机信息系统完成。大手术定义为通常伴有大量出血的手术。对于每项结果异常的患者,确定另外两名接受相同手术且年龄和性别匹配的对照患者。通过详细的病历审查,比较病例组和对照组患者在管理计划的变化、血液制品的使用、失血量和出血并发症方面的情况。共回顾了828例接受九种不同手术的患者。PC异常的发生率为2.2%[95%置信区间(CI)1.2 - 3.2%],PT/aPTT异常的发生率为2.1%(95%CI 1.1 - 3.1%)。凝血功能检测未显示临床指征的血小板减少和PT/aPTT延长各仅有两例。尽管(与对照组相比)检测结果异常的患者在麻醉计划方面有更多变化(36%对2%,p < 0.001)以及血小板或新鲜冰冻血浆输注方面有更多变化(50%对9%,p < 0.001),但失血量和出血并发症的发生率并无差异。我们得出结论,接受非心脏大手术患者的术前凝血功能检测仍应以临床评估为指导。手术本身并不构成检测的指征。