Ward Alex R, Robertson Valma J, Makowski Raphael J
Department of Human Physiology and Anatomy, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):1024-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33116.
To determine the effect of single cycles of alternating current of various frequencies on sensory and motor thresholds and on relative thresholds (motor threshold/sensory threshold).
Repeated-measures design.
Laboratory setting.
University student and staff volunteers (N=16; mean age, 34y).
Single cycles of sinewave frequencies between 1 and 35kHz were delivered at 50Hz. The frequencies were applied in a random order.
The motor and sensory thresholds were recorded at each applied frequency.
Both sensory and motor thresholds showed a smooth decrease to a minimum at approximately 3kHz. The relative threshold reached a minimum close to 9kHz. Comparison with previous studies showed that although absolute thresholds reach a minimum at a frequency that depends on electrode size, the frequency at which the relative threshold is a minimum was independent of electrode size and independent of whether the stimulus was applied as single pulses or in burst mode.
The optimal frequency for transcutaneous stimulation using medium-frequency alternating current depends on the outcome measure used. It would therefore be desirable for clinical stimulators to provide a selection of carrier frequencies.
确定不同频率的单周期交流电对感觉阈值、运动阈值以及相对阈值(运动阈值/感觉阈值)的影响。
重复测量设计。
实验室环境。
大学生和工作人员志愿者(N = 16;平均年龄34岁)。
以50Hz的频率施加1至35kHz之间的单周期正弦波频率。这些频率以随机顺序施加。
记录每个施加频率下的运动和感觉阈值。
感觉阈值和运动阈值均在约3kHz时平滑下降至最小值。相对阈值在接近9kHz时达到最小值。与先前研究的比较表明,尽管绝对阈值在取决于电极大小的频率处达到最小值,但相对阈值最小的频率与电极大小无关,且与刺激是以单脉冲还是爆发模式施加无关。
使用中频交流电进行经皮刺激的最佳频率取决于所使用的观察指标。因此,临床刺激器提供多种载波频率的选择将是可取的。