Suppr超能文献

中频交流电刺激的感觉、运动和疼痛阈值。

Sensory, motor, and pain thresholds for stimulation with medium frequency alternating current.

作者信息

Ward A R, Robertson V J

机构信息

School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Mar;79(3):273-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90006-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of frequency of alternating current on the sensory, motor, and pain thresholds in normal subjects, and to establish the optimal frequency for motor stimulation with minimal subject discomfort.

DESIGN

A repeated measures design using two groups of 11 subjects.

SETTING

A laboratory setting was used.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were volunteers who met the inclusion criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Alternating current with 20 different carrier frequencies between 1 and 35 kHz, all modulated at 50 Hz, was applied to each subject on two separate occasions. For half the subjects, the frequency was increased or decreased sequentially (reversed on second occasion), and for the other half, it was applied in a different random order on each occasion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The voltage at the sensory threshold was recorded for each applied frequency. This was subsequently repeated for motor and pain thresholds.

RESULTS

Sensory, motor, and pain thresholds decreased with increasing frequency between 1 kHz and approximately 10 kHz. Above 10 kHz, the thresholds increased. The ratio pain threshold/sensory threshold increased systematically with increasing frequency over the range examined. By contrast, the ratio pain threshold/motor threshold showed a distinct maximum at a frequency of 10 kHz. Marked accommodation to motor and pain fiber stimulation was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

For comfortable sensory stimulation, a high frequency of alternating current is preferable. Discrimination between pain and motor stimulation is maximal at a frequency of approximately 10 kHz. This suggests that the optimal frequency for comfortable motor stimulation, one that is least likely to elicit pain fiber stimulation, is close to 10 kHz.

摘要

目的

研究交流电频率对正常受试者感觉阈值、运动阈值和疼痛阈值的影响,并确定在使受试者不适最小的情况下进行运动刺激的最佳频率。

设计

采用两组各11名受试者的重复测量设计。

设置

使用实验室环境。

参与者

符合纳入标准的志愿者。

干预措施

将1至35千赫兹之间20种不同载波频率、均以50赫兹调制的交流电,在两个不同场合分别施加于每位受试者。对于一半受试者,频率依次升高或降低(第二次场合相反),对于另一半受试者,每次以不同随机顺序施加。

主要观察指标

记录每个施加频率下的感觉阈值电压。随后对运动阈值和疼痛阈值重复此操作。

结果

在1千赫兹至约10千赫兹之间,感觉阈值、运动阈值和疼痛阈值随频率增加而降低。高于10千赫兹时,阈值升高。在所研究范围内,疼痛阈值/感觉阈值之比随频率增加而系统性升高。相比之下,疼痛阈值/运动阈值之比在10千赫兹频率时呈现明显最大值。观察到对运动纤维和疼痛纤维刺激有明显适应现象。

结论

对于舒适的感觉刺激,较高频率的交流电更可取。在约10千赫兹频率时,疼痛刺激与运动刺激之间的辨别力最大。这表明,产生舒适运动刺激(最不可能引发疼痛纤维刺激)的最佳频率接近10千赫兹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验