• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Legal vulnerability of assessment tools.

作者信息

Tweed Michael, Miola Jose

机构信息

Division of Medical Education, Leicester Warwick Medical School.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2001 May;23(3):312-314. doi: 10.1080/014215901300353922.

DOI:10.1080/014215901300353922
PMID:12098405
Abstract

Legal challenges relating to assessment results are increasing around the world. Until recently such challenges were not possible in the UK. With changes to the law, including the Human Rights Act, it is now possible for an Examining Body to have its assessment process challenged. Defending an assessment tool is potentially easy but not being prepared could lead to embarrassing defeat, with significant costs and damages to pay. Judgement may be made as to what constitutes appropriate methods of evaluating and the levels that assessments must attain. There are more questions than answers as to what will happen and who will be the true beneficiaries of potential and real challenges.

摘要

相似文献

1
Legal vulnerability of assessment tools.
Med Teach. 2001 May;23(3):312-314. doi: 10.1080/014215901300353922.
2
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
3
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
4
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
5
Development of a data management tool for investigating multivariate space and free will experiences in virtual reality.用于研究虚拟现实中多元空间和自由意志体验的数据管理工具的开发。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Sep;30(3):319-31. doi: 10.1007/s10484-005-6386-y.
6
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.转基因植物及其衍生食品和饲料的安全性与营养评估:动物饲养试验的作用
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
7
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
8
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.
9
Benefit adequacy among elderly Social Security retired-worker beneficiaries and the SSI federal benefit rate.老年社会保障退休工人受益人的福利充足性与补充保障收入联邦福利率。
Soc Secur Bull. 2007;67(3):29-51.
10
Development of a Web-based question database for students' self-assessment.开发用于学生自我评估的基于网络的问题数据库。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):925.

引用本文的文献

1
Providing Validation Evidence for a Clinical-Science Module: Improving Testing Reliability with Quizzes.
Innov Pharm. 2021 Feb 26;12(1). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i1.2235. eCollection 2021.
2
Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?临床评估中的评分者间信度: examiner pairings 是否会影响考生评分?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 11;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02009-4.
3
Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?在项目评估中做出学生进展决策:我们能否从临床决策和陪审团决策推断出来?
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 30;19(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1583-1.
4
Improving reliability of a residency interview process.提高住院医师面试流程的可靠性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Oct 14;77(8):168. doi: 10.5688/ajpe778168.
5
Joining the dots: conditional pass and programmatic assessment enhances recognition of problems with professionalism and factors hampering student progress.串联线索:条件通过和程序化评估增强了对专业精神问题和阻碍学生进步因素的识别。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Jun 7;11:29. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-29.
6
Metrics in medical education.医学教育中的指标
Ulster Med J. 2010 May;79(2):52-6.