• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高档案袋评估的可靠性:评估者之间的讨论

Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussions between assessors.

作者信息

Pitts John, Coles Colin, Thomas Peter, Smith Frank

机构信息

NHS Executive South East Region (Wessex Deanery) Winchester, King Alfred's College Winchester, UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2002 Mar;24(2):197-201. doi: 10.1080/01421590220125321.

DOI:10.1080/01421590220125321
PMID:12098441
Abstract

This paper reports the reliability in assessments of a series of portfolios assembled by a cohort of participants attending a course for prospective general practice trainers. Initial individual assessments are compared with open discussion between random pairs of assessors to produce paired composite scores, and analysed using kappa statistics. Overall reliability of a global pass/refer judgement improved from a kappa of 0.26 (fair) using individual assessment, to 0.5 (moderate) with paired discussants.

摘要

本文报告了一组参加全科医生培训课程的学员所组建的一系列档案袋评估的可靠性。将最初的个人评估与评估者随机配对进行的公开讨论结果相比较,得出配对综合分数,并使用kappa统计量进行分析。整体及格/参考判断的可靠性从个人评估时的kappa值0.26(一般)提高到配对讨论者时的0.5(中等)。

相似文献

1
Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussions between assessors.提高档案袋评估的可靠性:评估者之间的讨论
Med Teach. 2002 Mar;24(2):197-201. doi: 10.1080/01421590220125321.
2
Educational portfolios in the assessment of general practice trainers: reliability of assessors.用于评估全科医生培训师的教育档案袋:评估者的可靠性
Med Educ. 1999 Jul;33(7):515-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00445.x.
3
Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: 'shaping' the portfolio.提高档案袋评估的可靠性:“塑造”档案袋。
Med Teach. 2001 Jul;23(4):351-356. doi: 10.1080/01421590120057021.
4
Exploring students' perceptions on the use of significant event analysis, as part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning.探索学生对将重大事件分析作为全科医疗档案袋评估过程的一部分,作为学习如何在学习中运用反思的一种工具的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2007 Mar 30;7:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-7-5.
5
Portfolios for assessment of paediatric specialist registrars.儿科专科住院医生评估档案
Med Educ. 2004 Oct;38(10):1117-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01961.x.
6
Training less-experienced faculty improves reliability of skills assessment in cardiac surgery.培训经验不足的教员可提高心脏外科手术技能评估的可靠性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2491-6.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Putting double marking to the test: a framework to assess if it is worth the trouble.
Med Educ. 2005 Mar;39(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02093.x.
8
Development and testing of a portfolio evaluation scoring tool.投资组合评估评分工具的开发与测试。
J Nurs Educ. 2010 Feb;49(2):78-86. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20090918-07. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
9
Consultation competence in general practice: testing the reliability of the Leicester assessment package.全科医疗中的会诊能力:检验莱斯特评估工具包的可靠性。
Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Jul;44(384):293-6.
10
Assessment of surgical skills in implant dentistry.口腔种植外科技术评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Jul-Aug;19(4):542-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education.反思性档案袋在健康科学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):34. doi: 10.5688/aj710234.
2
[Reflections on the feasibility and applicability of the portfolio].关于投资组合的可行性和适用性的思考
Aten Primaria. 2006 Sep;38(4):243; author reply 244. doi: 10.1157/13092353.
3
Portfolios, appraisal, revalidation, and all that: a user's guide for consultants.职业档案、评估、再认证以及诸如此类:咨询师用户指南
Arch Dis Child. 2005 Feb;90(2):165-70. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.043273.