反思性档案袋在健康科学教育中的应用。
Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education.
作者信息
Plaza Cecilia M, Draugalis Jolaine Reierson, Slack Marion K, Skrepnek Grant H, Sauer Karen Ann
机构信息
The University of Arizona College of Pharmacy, USA.
出版信息
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):34. doi: 10.5688/aj710234.
Abstract
Reflective portfolios are a collection of evidence that through critical reflection on its contents demonstrate achievement as well as personal and professional development. The purpose of this paper is to provide a review of the literature on the use of reflective portfolios and to develop a set of factors to guide schools and colleges of pharmacy as they implement reflective portfolios into their respective curricula as stated in Standards 2007.
摘要
反思性档案袋是一系列证据的集合，通过对其内容进行批判性反思，展示出成就以及个人和专业发展。本文的目的是对有关反思性档案袋使用的文献进行综述，并制定一系列因素，以指导药学院校在按照《2007年标准》将反思性档案袋纳入各自课程时提供参考。
相似文献
1
Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education.反思性档案袋在健康科学教育中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Apr 15;71(2):34. doi: 10.5688/aj710234.
2
The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.研究生评估与教育组合的有效性：BEME指南第12号
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):299-318. doi: 10.1080/01421590902883056.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果：最佳证据医学教育（BEME）系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Use of portfolios in otolaryngology graduate medical education.在耳鼻喉科研究生医学教育中使用档案袋。
Laryngoscope. 2011 Jun;121(6):1173-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.21803. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
5
Portfolios and the assessment of competence in nursing: a literature review.护理领域的档案袋与能力评估：文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jan;44(1):143-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.013. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
6
Students' perceptions on the use of portfolios in pre-registration nursing education: a questionnaire survey.学生对注册前护理教育中使用档案袋的看法：一项问卷调查
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):333-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.05.005. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
7
Portfolios in Saudi medical colleges. Why and how?沙特医学院校的档案袋。为何以及如何（建立）？
Saudi Med J. 2016 Mar;37(3):245-8. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.3.12937.
8
Marking criteria for assessing practice-based portfolios at masters' level.硕士水平基于实践的作品集评估评分标准。
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 Jul;25(5):377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.006.
9
Electronic portfolios in nursing education: a review of the literature.电子Portfolio 在护理教育中的应用：文献回顾
Nurse Educ Pract. 2014 Jan;14(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2013.08.011. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
10
The unintended consequences of portfolios in graduate medical education.毕业后医学教育中组合模式的意外后果。
Acad Med. 2009 Nov;84(11):1522-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181bb2636.
引用本文的文献
1
Grading reflective essays: the construct validity and reliability of a newly developed Tool- GRE-9.评价反思性文章：新开发的工具-GRE-9 的构建效度和信度。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Nov 16;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04845-6.
2
Teacher-led versus student-led seminar blended with portfolio for "assessment of learning": An interventional study.教师主导与学生主导的研讨会结合档案袋用于“学习评估”：一项干预性研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Oct 31;11:339. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_165_22. eCollection 2022.
3
Grading reflective essays: the reliability of a newly developed tool- GRE-9.反思性文章评分：一种新开发工具GRE - 9的可靠性
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02213-2.
4
Pharmacy Students' Perceptions of Reflective Portfolios and their Effect on Students' Deep Information-Processing Skills.药学专业学生对反思性文件夹的看法及其对学生深度信息处理技能的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Aug;83(6):6851. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6851.
5
A Comprehensive Reflective Journal-Writing Framework for Pharmacy Students to Increase Self-Awareness and Develop Actionable Goals.一个全面的药学专业学生反思性日志写作框架，旨在提高自我意识和制定可操作的目标。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Apr;83(3):6554. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6554.
6
How to Conceptualize and Implement a PhD Program in Health Sciences-The Basel Approach.如何构思并实施健康科学博士项目——巴塞尔方法
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2018 Apr 24;5:2382120518771364. doi: 10.1177/2382120518771364. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
7
The Use of Portfolios in US Pharmacy Schools.美国药学院中使用档案袋评价的情况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Apr;82(3):6239. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6239.
8
Reflection Is Not Reflexive.反思并非自反性的。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Nov;81(9):6832. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6832.
9
Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy.研究生生物医学科学教育需要新哲学。
mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6):e01539-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01539-17.
10
Targeting within Pharmacy Education.药学教育中的目标定位。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):6243. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6243.
本文引用的文献
1
Programmatic curricular outcomes assessment at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.美国和波多黎各药学院校的课程成果评估规划
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Feb 15;70(1):8. doi: 10.5688/aj700108.
2
Using portfolios to evaluate achievement of population-based public health nursing competencies in baccalaureate nursing students.运用档案袋评估本科护理专业学生基于人群的公共卫生护理能力的达成情况。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2005 Mar-Apr;26(2):104-12.
3
Marking criteria for assessing practice-based portfolios at masters' level.硕士水平基于实践的作品集评估评分标准。
Nurse Educ Today. 2005 Jul;25(5):377-89. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.03.006.
4
Reflective practice: a meaningful task for students.反思性实践：对学生而言意义重大的任务。
Nurs Stand. 2005;19(26):33-7. doi: 10.7748/ns2005.03.19.26.33.c3818.
5
The use of qualitative research criteria for portfolio assessment as an alternative to reliability evaluation: a case study.运用质性研究标准进行档案袋评价以替代信度评估：一项案例研究
Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):214-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02059.x.
6
Portfolio outcome assessment: lessons learned.投资组合结果评估：经验教训
Nurse Educ. 2004 Mar-Apr;29(2):52-3. doi: 10.1097/00006223-200403000-00004.
7
Evaluating portfolio assessment systems: what are the appropriate criteria?评估作品集评估系统：合适的标准是什么？
Nurse Educ Today. 2003 Nov;23(8):600-9. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(03)00098-4.
8
From process to outcome: the effect of portfolio assessment on student learning.从过程到结果：档案袋评价对学生学习的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2003 May;23(4):269-77. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(03)00012-1.
9
Portfolios and assessment of competence: a review of the literature.能力组合与评估：文献综述
J Adv Nurs. 2003 Feb;41(3):283-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02528.x.
10
Enhancing reliability in portfolio assessment: discussions between assessors.提高档案袋评估的可靠性：评估者之间的讨论
Med Teach. 2002 Mar;24(2):197-201. doi: 10.1080/01421590220125321.
Zotero 插件