Rosenberg Charles E
Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Science Center 235, One Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):237-60. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00003.
The articulation and acceptance of specific disease entities constitute one of the most important intellectual and cultural events of the past two centuries. This notion is central to how we organize health care delivery, think about ourselves, debate and formulate social policy, and define and manage deviance. Diagnosis is indispensable to linking specific disease concepts with doctor and patient and the social and economic institutions shaping such clinical interactions. Disease is a social entity, not an array of ideal types. The history of medicine is partly the story of how disease entities have become social entities, accumulating the flesh of diagnostic and therapeutic practice, social expectation, and bureaucratic reification. Despite criticism of reductionist medicine in the West and less focus on disease entities and mechanisms, our social response still depends on this concept of sickness. But this concept can no longer remain invisible if we are to understand contemporary medicine as both a social and a technological system.
特定疾病实体的明确与认可构成了过去两个世纪最重要的知识和文化事件之一。这一观念对于我们组织医疗服务、认识自我、辩论并制定社会政策以及界定和管理偏差行为的方式至关重要。诊断对于将特定疾病概念与医生、患者以及塑造此类临床互动的社会和经济机构联系起来不可或缺。疾病是一种社会实体,而非一系列理想类型。医学史部分讲述了疾病实体如何成为社会实体,积累了诊断和治疗实践、社会期望以及官僚化具体化的实质内容。尽管西方对还原论医学存在批评,且对疾病实体和机制的关注减少,但我们的社会反应仍然依赖于这种疾病观念。但如果我们要将当代医学理解为一个社会和技术系统,这一观念就不能再被忽视。