Halpin Michael, Cortez Dagoberto
Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, 6135 University Drive, Halifax, NS Canada.
Sociology Department, The University of Texas, 305 E 23rd St, Austin, TX USA.
Theory Soc. 2025;54(2):243-276. doi: 10.1007/s11186-025-09611-9. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
Medicalization is an important theory that has been subject to numerous debates. Drawing on three varied datasets, we forward a relational approach to medicalization that responds to critiques while aiming to reinvigorate the theory with new concepts and questions. In contrast to prior process-based work, our relational approach argues that medicalization is best understood as an action or activity undertaken by specific groups or actors. We further suggest that unequal relations characterize medicalization. Specifically, we argue that 1) groups or actors receive a benefit from participating in medicalization, which we call the medicalizing dividend and, 2) an actor/group occupies a hegemonic position in medicalizing relations, reaping the largest dividend and constraining other actors. While we assert that pharmaceutical companies are currently hegemonic, we argue that their hegemony is not indefinite. We discuss how our approach facilitates links between medicalization and other theories, while outlining future steps for medicalization research.
医学化是一个备受诸多争议的重要理论。基于三个不同的数据集,我们提出了一种医学化的关系性方法,该方法回应了各种批评,同时旨在用新的概念和问题为这一理论注入新的活力。与先前基于过程的研究不同,我们的关系性方法认为,医学化最好被理解为特定群体或行为者所采取的一种行动或活动。我们进一步指出,不平等关系是医学化的特征。具体而言,我们认为:1)群体或行为者从参与医学化中获得益处,我们将其称为医学化红利;2)一个行为者/群体在医学化关系中占据霸权地位,获取最大的红利并限制其他行为者。虽然我们断言制药公司目前处于霸权地位,但我们认为它们的霸权并非是无限期的。我们讨论了我们的方法如何促进医学化与其他理论之间的联系,同时概述了医学化研究的未来方向。