• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Rethinking medicalization: unequal relations, hegemonic medicalization, and the medicalizing dividend.重新思考医学化:不平等关系、霸权医学化与医学化红利
Theory Soc. 2025;54(2):243-276. doi: 10.1007/s11186-025-09611-9. Epub 2025 Mar 3.
2
[Complementary and alternative medicine and social medicalization: lack of definitions, risks, and potentials in primary healthcare].[补充替代医学与社会医学化:初级医疗保健中缺乏定义、风险及潜力]
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Sep 4;36(9):e00231519. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00231519.
3
Promoting diseases to promote drugs: The role of the pharmaceutical industry in fostering good and bad medicalization.促进疾病以促进药物:制药业在促进良医和滥医中的作用。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan;88(1):34-39. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14835. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Bringing the Global into Medical Sociology: Medicalization, Narrative, and Global Health.将全球纳入医学社会学:医学化、叙事和全球健康。
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Sep;65(3):309-322. doi: 10.1177/00221465241249701. Epub 2024 May 13.
5
Negotiating intersex: A case for revising the theory of social diagnosis.协商双性人问题:修订社会诊断理论的一个案例
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;175:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.047. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
6
Medicalization: current concept and future directions in a bionic society.医学化:仿生社会中的当前概念与未来方向
Mens Sana Monogr. 2012 Jan;10(1):122-33. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.91587.
7
Medicalizing disabled people's emotions-Symptom of a dis/ableist society.将残疾人的情绪医学化——残障主义社会的症状。
Front Sociol. 2023 Dec 11;8:1230361. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1230361. eCollection 2023.
8
Medicalizing to demedicalize: lactation consultants and the (de)medicalization of breastfeeding.医学化到去医学化:哺乳顾问与母乳喂养的(去)医学化。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Jan;100:159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.013. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
9
Effects of medicalization on case outcomes in transgender employment discrimination court decisions.医学化对跨性别就业歧视法庭判决中案件结果的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2024 Sep-Oct;42(5):620-635. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2685. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
10
Rethinking the Medicalization of Violence: The Risks of a Behavioral Addiction Model.重新思考暴力的医学化:行为成瘾模型的风险。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;48(4_suppl):179-182. doi: 10.1177/1073110520979420.

本文引用的文献

1
Bringing the Global into Medical Sociology: Medicalization, Narrative, and Global Health.将全球纳入医学社会学:医学化、叙事和全球健康。
J Health Soc Behav. 2024 Sep;65(3):309-322. doi: 10.1177/00221465241249701. Epub 2024 May 13.
2
'Financial fallout' in the US biopharmaceutical industry: Maximizing shareholder value, regulatory capture, and the consequences for patients.美国生物制药行业的“财务困境”:股东价值最大化、监管俘获及其对患者的影响
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;344:116598. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116598. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
Stalling or oiling the engines of diagnosis? Shifting perspectives on the DSM and categorical diagnosis in psychiatry.诊断引擎的停滞还是润滑?精神病学中对《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》及分类诊断的观点转变
Sociol Health Illn. 2024 Mar;46(S1):132-151. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13682. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
4
Stratified medicalization of schooling difficulties.分层医学化的学业困难现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115039. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115039. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Interaction order and the labeling of disorder: How parents mobilize personal knowledge in the clinic to resist medicalization of their children's behavior.互动顺序与失调的标签化:父母如何在临床实践中调动个人知识来抵制儿童行为的医学化。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Feb;294:114719. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114719. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
6
How Pharmaceuticals Mask Health and Social Inequity.药品如何掩盖健康和社会不平等。
AMA J Ethics. 2021 Jul 1;23(7):E542-549. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2021.542.
7
Waivers and Alterations of Research Informed Consent During the COVID-19 Pandemic.研究知情同意在 COVID-19 大流行期间的豁免和变更。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Mar;174(3):415-416. doi: 10.7326/M20-6993. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
It is unprecedented: trial management during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.这是前所未有的:COVID-19 大流行期间及之后的临床试验管理。
Trials. 2020 Sep 11;21(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04711-6.
9
Profitability of Large Pharmaceutical Companies Compared With Other Large Public Companies.大型制药公司与其他大型上市公司的盈利能力比较。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):834-843. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0442.
10
Lobbying Expenditures and Campaign Contributions by the Pharmaceutical and Health Product Industry in the United States, 1999-2018.美国制药和保健品行业 1999-2018 年的游说支出和竞选捐款。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):688-697. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0146.

重新思考医学化:不平等关系、霸权医学化与医学化红利

Rethinking medicalization: unequal relations, hegemonic medicalization, and the medicalizing dividend.

作者信息

Halpin Michael, Cortez Dagoberto

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, Dalhousie University, 6135 University Drive, Halifax, NS Canada.

Sociology Department, The University of Texas, 305 E 23rd St, Austin, TX USA.

出版信息

Theory Soc. 2025;54(2):243-276. doi: 10.1007/s11186-025-09611-9. Epub 2025 Mar 3.

DOI:10.1007/s11186-025-09611-9
PMID:40351371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12062157/
Abstract

Medicalization is an important theory that has been subject to numerous debates. Drawing on three varied datasets, we forward a relational approach to medicalization that responds to critiques while aiming to reinvigorate the theory with new concepts and questions. In contrast to prior process-based work, our relational approach argues that medicalization is best understood as an action or activity undertaken by specific groups or actors. We further suggest that unequal relations characterize medicalization. Specifically, we argue that 1) groups or actors receive a benefit from participating in medicalization, which we call the medicalizing dividend and, 2) an actor/group occupies a hegemonic position in medicalizing relations, reaping the largest dividend and constraining other actors. While we assert that pharmaceutical companies are currently hegemonic, we argue that their hegemony is not indefinite. We discuss how our approach facilitates links between medicalization and other theories, while outlining future steps for medicalization research.

摘要

医学化是一个备受诸多争议的重要理论。基于三个不同的数据集,我们提出了一种医学化的关系性方法,该方法回应了各种批评,同时旨在用新的概念和问题为这一理论注入新的活力。与先前基于过程的研究不同,我们的关系性方法认为,医学化最好被理解为特定群体或行为者所采取的一种行动或活动。我们进一步指出,不平等关系是医学化的特征。具体而言,我们认为:1)群体或行为者从参与医学化中获得益处,我们将其称为医学化红利;2)一个行为者/群体在医学化关系中占据霸权地位,获取最大的红利并限制其他行为者。虽然我们断言制药公司目前处于霸权地位,但我们认为它们的霸权并非是无限期的。我们讨论了我们的方法如何促进医学化与其他理论之间的联系,同时概述了医学化研究的未来方向。