Araus J L, Slafer G A, Reynolds M P, Royo C
Unitat de Fisiologia Vegetal, Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Ann Bot. 2002 Jun;89 Spec No(7):925-40. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf049.
Drought is the main abiotic constraint on cereal yield. Analysing physiological determinants of yield responses to water may help in breeding for higher yield and stability under drought conditions. The traits to select (either for stress escape, avoidance or tolerance) and the framework where breeding for drought stress is addressed will depend on the level and timing of stress in the targeted area. If the stress is severe, breeding under stress-free conditions may be unsuccessful and traits that confer survival may become a priority. However, selecting for yield itself under stress-alleviated conditions appears to produce superior cultivars, not only for optimum environments, but also for those characterized by frequent mild and moderate stress conditions. This implies that broad avoidance/tolerance to mild-moderate stresses is given by constitutive traits also expressed under stress-free conditions. In this paper, we focus on physiological traits that contribute to improved productivity under mild-moderate drought. Increased crop performance may be achieved through improvements in water use, water-use efficiency and harvest index. The first factor is relevant when soil water remains available at maturity or when deep-rooted genotypes access water in the soil profile that is not normally available; the two latter conditions become more important when all available water is exhausted by the end of the crop cycle. Independent of the mechanism operating, a canopy able to use more water than another would have more open stomata and therefore higher canopy temperature depression, and 13C discrimination (delta13C) in plant matter. The same traits would also seem to be relevant when breeding for hot, irrigated environments. Where additional water is not available to the crop, higher water-use efficiency (WUE) appears to be an alternative strategy to improve crop performance. In this context delta13C constitutes a simple but reliable measure of WUE. However, in contrast to lines performing better because of increased access to water, lines producing greater biomass due to superior WUE will have lower delta13C values. WUE may be modified not only through a decrease in stomatal conductance, but also through an increase in photosynthetic capacity. Harvest index is strongly reduced by terminal drought (i.e. drought during grain filling). Thus, phenological traits increasing the relative amount of water used during grain filling, or adjusting the crop cycle to the seasonal pattern of rainfall may be useful. Augmenting the contribution of carbohydrate reserves accumulated during vegetative growth to grain filling may also be worthwhile in harsh environmcnts. Alternatively, extending the duration of stem elongation without changing the timing of anthesis would increase the number of grains per spike and the harvest index without changing the amount of water utilized by the crop.
干旱是制约谷物产量的主要非生物因素。分析产量对水分响应的生理决定因素,可能有助于培育在干旱条件下具有更高产量和稳定性的品种。选择的性状(用于避旱、抗旱或耐旱)以及应对干旱胁迫育种的框架,将取决于目标地区胁迫的程度和时间。如果胁迫严重,在无胁迫条件下育种可能会失败,赋予生存能力的性状可能会成为优先选择。然而,在胁迫缓解条件下选择产量本身,似乎能培育出优良品种,不仅适用于最优环境,也适用于那些以频繁轻度和中度胁迫为特征的环境。这意味着对轻度至中度胁迫的广泛避旱/耐旱能力,由在无胁迫条件下也能表达的组成型性状赋予。在本文中,我们关注有助于在轻度至中度干旱条件下提高生产力的生理性状。通过改善水分利用、水分利用效率和收获指数,可以提高作物表现。当成熟时土壤仍有可用水分,或深根基因型能够获取土壤剖面中通常无法获得的水分时,第一个因素就很重要;当作物生长周期结束时所有可用水分耗尽时,后两个条件就变得更为重要。无论起作用的机制如何,一个能够比另一个利用更多水分的冠层,其气孔会更开放,因此冠层温度降幅更大,植物物质中的碳同位素分馏(δ13C)也更低。在为炎热、灌溉环境育种时,这些相同的性状似乎也很重要。当作物无法获得额外水分时,提高水分利用效率(WUE)似乎是提高作物表现的另一种策略。在这种情况下,δ13C构成了一种简单但可靠的WUE测量方法。然而,与因获得更多水分而表现更好的品系不同,由于WUE高而产生更多生物量的品系,其δ13C值会更低。WUE不仅可以通过降低气孔导度来改变,也可以通过提高光合能力来改变。收获指数会因终期干旱(即灌浆期干旱)而大幅降低。因此,增加灌浆期相对耗水量的物候性状,或使作物生长周期与降雨季节模式相匹配,可能会很有用。在恶劣环境中,增加营养生长期间积累的碳水化合物储备对灌浆的贡献,可能也值得一试。或者,在不改变花期时间的情况下延长茎伸长的持续时间,将增加每穗粒数和收获指数,而不改变作物的耗水量。