Chavan Varsha, Dalby Richard
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
AAPS PharmSci. 2002;4(2):E6. doi: 10.1208/ps040206.
This study evaluated the effect of inhaled volume and simulated inspiratory flow rate ramps on fine particle output from dry powder inhalers (DPIs). A simple, robust system was developed to account for "rate of rise" (ramp) effects while maintaining a constant air flow through a multi-stage liquid impinger (MSLI), used for sizing the emitted particles. Ramps were programmed to reach 30 and 60 L/min over 100 milliseconds; 500 milliseconds; and 1, 2, and 3 seconds. Rotahaler was chosen as the test DPI. Testing was done with simulated inhalation volumes of 2 L and 4 L. Testing was also carried out using the USP apparatus 4. At 30 L/min, for a 2 L volume, the amount of drug exiting the device in fine particle fraction (FPF) increased from 2.33 microg to 6.04 microg from the 3-second ramp to the 100-millisecond ramp, with 11.64 microg in FPF for the USP (no ramp) method. At the same flow rate, for a 4 L volume, FPF increased from 2.23 microg to 8.45 microg, with 10.25 microg for the USP method. At 60 L/min, similar trends were observed. In general, at both flow rates, an increase in FPF was noted going from the shallowest to the steepest ramp. However, there were no significant differences in FPF when a 2 L inhaled volume was compared with a 4 L volume at each flow rate. Overall, these data suggest that the existing USP apparatus may overestimate FPF at flow rates lower than those recommended by the USP.
本研究评估了吸入体积和模拟吸气流量斜坡对干粉吸入器(DPI)细颗粒输出量的影响。开发了一个简单、可靠的系统,以考虑“上升速率”(斜坡)效应,同时通过用于对排放颗粒进行分级的多级液体撞击器(MSLI)保持恒定的气流。斜坡程序设定为在100毫秒、500毫秒以及1、2和3秒内达到30升/分钟和60升/分钟。选择罗塔哈勒吸入器作为测试DPI。测试采用2升和4升的模拟吸入体积进行。测试还使用美国药典装置4进行。在30升/分钟时,对于2升的体积,从3秒斜坡到100毫秒斜坡,以细颗粒分数(FPF)形式离开装置的药物量从2.33微克增加到6.04微克,美国药典(无斜坡)方法的FPF为11.64微克。在相同流速下,对于4升的体积,FPF从2.23微克增加到8.45微克,美国药典方法的FPF为10.25微克。在60升/分钟时,观察到类似趋势。一般来说,在两种流速下,从最平缓的斜坡到最陡峭的斜坡,FPF都有所增加。然而,在每种流速下比较2升吸入体积和4升吸入体积时,FPF没有显著差异。总体而言,这些数据表明,现有的美国药典装置在流速低于美国药典推荐值时可能高估了FPF。