Suppr超能文献

开发在实验室中评估患者和护理人员如何使用吸入装置的方法:临床适当测试的必要性。

Developing ways to evaluate in the laboratory how inhalation devices will be used by patients and care-givers: the need for clinically appropriate testing.

作者信息

Mitchell Jolyon P, Suggett Jason A

机构信息

Jolyon Mitchell Inhaler Consulting Services Inc., 1154 St. Anthony Road, London, Ontario, N6H 2R1, Canada,

出版信息

AAPS PharmSciTech. 2014 Oct;15(5):1275-91. doi: 10.1208/s12249-014-0145-4. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

Abstract

The design of methods in the pharmaceutical compendia for the laboratory-based evaluation of orally inhaled product (OIP) performance is intentionally aimed for simplicity and robustness in order to achieve the high degree of accuracy and precision required for the assurance of product quality in a regulated environment. Consequently, performance of the inhaler when used or even misused by the patient or care-giver has often not been assessed. Indeed, patient-use-based methodology has been developed in a somewhat piecemeal basis when a need has been perceived by the developing organization. There is, therefore, a lack of in-use test standardization across OIP platforms, and often important details have remained undisclosed beyond the sponsoring organization. The advent of international standards, such as ISO 20072:2009, that focus specifically on the OIP development process, together with the need to make these drug delivery devices more patient-friendly as an aid to improving compliance, is necessitating that clinically appropriate test procedures be standardized at the OIP class level. It is also important that their capabilities and limitations are well understood by stakeholders involved in the process. This article outlines how this process might take place, drawing on current examples in which significant advances in methodology have been achieved. Ideally, it is hoped that such procedures, once appropriately validated, might eventually become incorporated into the pharmacopeial literature as a resource for future inhaler developers, regulatory agencies, and clinicians seeking to understand how these devices will perform in use to augment ongoing product quality testing which is adequately served by existing methods.

摘要

药品药典中用于基于实验室评估吸入制剂(OIP)性能的方法设计,旨在实现简单性和稳健性,以满足在规范环境下确保产品质量所需的高精度和精密度。因此,患者或护理人员使用甚至误用吸入器时的性能往往未得到评估。实际上,当研发机构意识到有需求时,基于患者使用的方法是在某种程度上逐步发展起来的。因此,不同OIP平台缺乏使用测试的标准化,而且除了申办机构外,重要细节往往未被披露。国际标准的出现,如ISO 20072:2009,专门关注OIP的开发过程,以及需要使这些药物输送装置对患者更友好以帮助提高依从性,这就要求在OIP类别层面将临床适用的测试程序标准化。参与该过程的利益相关者也必须充分了解这些程序的能力和局限性。本文概述了这一过程可能如何发生,并借鉴了目前在方法学上取得重大进展的实例。理想情况下,希望这些程序一旦经过适当验证,最终可能会纳入药典文献,为未来的吸入器开发者以及寻求了解这些装置在实际使用中性能的监管机构和临床医生提供参考,以补充现有方法充分满足的现行产品质量测试。

相似文献

2
Comparison of ISO standards for device performance; 20072 and 27427: a critical appraisal.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012 Aug;25(4):209-16. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0927.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Clinically Relevant In Vitro Testing of Orally Inhaled Products-Bridging the Gap Between the Lab and the Patient.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2016 Aug;17(4):787-804. doi: 10.1208/s12249-016-0543-x. Epub 2016 May 12.
5
Patient Focus and Regulatory Considerations for Inhalation Device Design: Report from the 2015 IPAC-RS/ISAM Workshop.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2017 Feb;30(1):1-13. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2016.1326. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
8
Product lifecycle approach to cascade impaction measurements.
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011 Mar;12(1):312-22. doi: 10.1208/s12249-011-9590-5. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Improved laboratory test methods for orally inhaled products.
Ther Deliv. 2013 Aug;4(8):1003-26. doi: 10.4155/tde.13.66.
2
Validation of a general in vitro approach for prediction of total lung deposition in healthy adults for pharmaceutical inhalation products.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Dec;26(6):355-69. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2012.0986. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
3
Assessing the performance of two dry powder inhalers in preschool children using an idealized pediatric upper airway model.
Int J Pharm. 2013 Feb 28;444(1-2):169-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
5
Comparison of ISO standards for device performance; 20072 and 27427: a critical appraisal.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012 Aug;25(4):209-16. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0927.
7
Inhaler mishandling remains common in real life and is associated with reduced disease control.
Respir Med. 2011 Jun;105(6):930-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.005. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
8
Improving the odds that patients and caregivers will use inhalers correctly: a manufacturer's response.
Prim Care Respir J. 2011 Jun;20(2):219-20. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00009.
10
In vitro/in vivo comparisons in pulmonary drug delivery.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2008 Mar;21(1):77-84. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2007.0643.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验