Fossella Frank V
Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030, USA.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2002 Jun;16(6 Suppl 6):45-51.
Two phase III trials were conducted using docetaxel (Taxotere), administered every 3 weeks, as second-line treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. In the TAX 317 trial, 204 patients were randomized to receive either docetaxel (49 received 100 mg/m2 and 55 received 75 mg/m2) or best supportive care (100 patients). Median survival was 7.5 months with docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (D75) vs 4.6 months for best supportive care (P = .010); and 1-year survival was 37% for D75 vs 11% for best supportive care (P = .010). Quality-of-life analysis also showed statistically significant improvement in disease-related symptoms with docetaxel vs best supportive care. In the TAX 320 study, 373 patients were randomized to receive docetaxel at 100 mg/m2 (D100), docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (D75), or a control arm of either vinorelbine (Navelbine) or ifosfamide (Ifex) (V/I). Partial response rates were 11.9% with D100 and 7.5% with D75 vs 1% with V/I (P values: .001 [D100] and .036 [D75]). Median response duration was over 7 months. One-year survival was 32% with D75 vs 19% in V/I (P = .025). Prior paclitaxel exposure had no bearing on the response rate and survival advantage of second-line treatment with docetaxel. Response rates to docetaxel were equivalent in the cohort of patients who had received prior paclitaxel (10.5%) and the group ofpatients who had not received prior paclitaxel (8.5%). The 1-year survival rates for patients with no prior paclitaxel therapy were 33% (D75) vs 20% (V/I); and the 1-year survival rates for patients who had received prior paclitaxel were 30% (D75) vs 17% (V/I). In conclusion, two large randomized phase III trials of second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC have shown significant differences favoring docetaxelfor response rate, time to progression, survival, and quality of life. Prior paclitaxel did not decrease the likelihood of response to docetaxel, nor did it lessen the survival advantage seen with docetaxeL Docetaxel offers a clinically meaningful benefit in this setting, with manageable toxicity. Based upon the observed response rates, survival, impact on quality of life, and toxicity profile, the optimal dose of docetaxel in this pretreated population is 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks.
两项III期试验使用多西他赛(泰索帝),每3周给药一次,作为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者在接受铂类化疗后的二线治疗。在TAX 317试验中,204例患者被随机分为接受多西他赛治疗(49例接受100mg/m²,55例接受75mg/m²)或最佳支持治疗(100例患者)。接受75mg/m²多西他赛(D75)治疗的患者中位生存期为7.5个月,而最佳支持治疗组为4.6个月(P = 0.010);D75组1年生存率为37%,最佳支持治疗组为11%(P = 0.010)。生活质量分析还显示,与最佳支持治疗相比,多西他赛在疾病相关症状方面有统计学意义的改善。在TAX 320研究中,373例患者被随机分为接受100mg/m²多西他赛(D100)、75mg/m²多西他赛(D75)或长春瑞滨(诺维本)或异环磷酰胺(和乐生)(V/I)的对照组。D100组的部分缓解率为11.9%,D75组为7.5%,V/I组为1%(P值:D100为0.001,D75为0.036)。中位缓解持续时间超过7个月。D75组1年生存率为32%,V/I组为19%(P = 0.025)。既往使用紫杉醇对多西他赛二线治疗的缓解率和生存优势没有影响。接受过紫杉醇治疗的患者队列(10.5%)和未接受过紫杉醇治疗的患者组(8.5%)对多西他赛的缓解率相当。未接受过紫杉醇治疗的患者1年生存率为33%(D75)对20%(V/I);接受过紫杉醇治疗的患者1年生存率为30%(D75)对17%(V/I)。总之,两项针对NSCLC二线化疗的大型随机III期试验显示,在缓解率、疾病进展时间、生存率和生活质量方面,多西他赛具有显著优势。既往使用紫杉醇并未降低对多西他赛的缓解可能性,也未削弱多西他赛的生存优势。在这种情况下,多西他赛具有临床意义的益处,且毒性可控。根据观察到的缓解率、生存率、对生活质量的影响和毒性特征,在该预处理人群中,多西他赛的最佳剂量为每3周75mg/m²。