Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌的治疗失败与切缘状态。对分子病理学潜在价值的批判性观点。

Treatment failure and margin status in head and neck cancer. A critical view on the potential value of molecular pathology.

作者信息

Slootweg Pieter J, Hordijk Gert Jan, Schade Yolanda, van Es Robert J J, Koole Ronald

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University Medical Center, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2002 Jul;38(5):500-3. doi: 10.1016/s1368-8375(01)00092-6.

Abstract

Molecular pathology may demonstrate tumour cells not detected by histology. The idea has emerged that these cells influence the prognosis negatively and that their detection will lead to more appropriate treatment and improved patient survival. We theorized that tumour cells at surgical margins overlooked by the pathologist should demonstrate their clinical significance by causing recurrences at the primary site in the patients reported to have tumour-free margins by histology. To assess this assumption, we investigated the prognostic influence of the histologically determined status of the surgical margins. The material that formed the basis of this study consisted of 394 patients that underwent resection for their primary tumour during the years 1990-1995. In 207 patients, initial treatment was complete as assessed by conventional histopathological examination of the surgical specimen. In 187 patients, initial treatment was incomplete, defined as tumour in or close to the margin, or mild, moderate or severe dysplasia or in situ cancer at the margin. Causes for treatment failure were recorded for both groups separately. In the group with tumour-free margins, 16.9% had a second primary head and neck cancer, 8.2% had a second tumour in the lung, 10.6% had recurrent disease in the neck, 2.9% had distant metastasis, and 3.9% had local recurrence at the same site as the primary cancer. For the group without tumour-free margins, these figures were the following: second primary in the head and neck area: 17.1%, second primary in the lung: 7.0%, recurrent disease in the neck: 11.8%, distant metastasis: 8.0% and local recurrence at the primary site: 21.9%. Local recurrences were rare in patients in which the pathologist reported the resection to be complete. Although there may be tumour cells in surgical margins that evade histological detection, their clinical impact appears to be almost negligible.

摘要

分子病理学可能会发现组织学检查未检测到的肿瘤细胞。有观点认为,这些细胞会对预后产生负面影响,而对它们的检测将带来更合适的治疗方法并提高患者生存率。我们推测,病理学家遗漏的手术切缘处的肿瘤细胞应通过在组织学报告切缘无肿瘤的患者中导致原发部位复发来显示其临床意义。为了评估这一假设,我们研究了手术切缘的组织学判定状态对预后的影响。本研究的基础材料包括1990年至1995年期间因原发性肿瘤接受切除术的394例患者。在207例患者中,通过对手术标本进行常规组织病理学检查评估,初始治疗是完整的。在187例患者中,初始治疗不完整,定义为切缘处有肿瘤或靠近切缘,或切缘处有轻度、中度或重度发育异常或原位癌。分别记录两组治疗失败的原因。在切缘无肿瘤的组中,16.9%患有第二原发性头颈癌,8.2%肺部有第二个肿瘤,10.6%颈部有复发性疾病,2.9%有远处转移,3.9%在与原发性癌相同的部位有局部复发。对于切缘无肿瘤的组,这些数字如下:头颈区域的第二原发性肿瘤:17.1%,肺部的第二原发性肿瘤:7.0%,颈部的复发性疾病:11.8%,远处转移:8.0%,原发性部位的局部复发:21.9%。在病理学家报告切除完整的患者中,局部复发很少见。尽管手术切缘可能存在逃避组织学检测的肿瘤细胞,但其临床影响似乎几乎可以忽略不计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验