Suppr超能文献

使用 Guglielmi 可脱卸弹簧圈治疗的残留破裂动脉瘤再生长,需进一步行手术夹闭治疗:7 例报告及文献复习

Regrowth of residual ruptured aneurysms treated by Guglielmi's Detachable Coils which demanded further treatment by surgical clipping: report of 7 cases and review of the literature.

作者信息

Conrad M D, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Morel C, Madarassy G, Schonauer C, Deruty R

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Hôpital Neurologique et Neurochirurgical, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002 May;144(5):419-26. doi: 10.1007/s007010200062.

Abstract

OBJECT

The management of intracranial aneurysms has truly evolved after the introduction of endovascular treatment by Guglielmi Detachable Coils (GDC). In our department, for every case (ruptured or unruptured aneurysm) we discuss in the first place endovascular treatment. When coiling is feasible, it is done as a first choice. If not (intracranial compressive haematoma, coiling unfeasible or dangerous), the patient is operated upon. Failure of the endovascular technique, like incomplete treatment and regrowth of the residual sac, becomes a subject of discussion. Some cases need complementary treatment for large or unstable residual aneurysm.

METHODS

Thus, between 1997 and 2000, 59 ruptured aneurysms were treated using an endovascular method by means of GDC. In 15 of this cases complementary treatment was needed, due to the size or instability of the residual aneurysm. In 8 cases a new embolization was possible and in 7 cases a complementary surgical procedure was needed, due to the impossibility of further endovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Out of these 7 cases who were operated upon after coiling, clipping of the residual neck was possible in 4 cases; in 3 cases clipping was impossible due to the partial filling of the aneurysm neck by the coils. In these 3 cases, a ligation of the residual neck, associated with coagulation of the sac was performed.

DISCUSSION

The difficulty of the treatment of an residual aneurysm after coiling is discussed as well as those surgical techniques alternative to clipping (wrapping or coagulation of the residual sac).

摘要

目的

自 Guglielmi 可脱卸弹簧圈(GDC)血管内治疗技术引入后,颅内动脉瘤的治疗方法有了实质性的进展。在我们科室,对于每一例病例(破裂或未破裂动脉瘤),我们首先讨论血管内治疗。当弹簧圈栓塞可行时,将其作为首选治疗方法。如果不可行(颅内压迫性血肿、弹簧圈栓塞不可行或有风险),则对患者进行手术治疗。血管内技术失败,如治疗不彻底及残留瘤囊再生长,成为讨论的话题。一些大的或不稳定的残留动脉瘤病例需要辅助治疗。

方法

因此,在1997年至2000年间,59例破裂动脉瘤采用GDC血管内治疗方法进行治疗。在这些病例中,15例因残留动脉瘤的大小或不稳定性需要辅助治疗。8例可行再次栓塞,7例因无法进一步进行血管内治疗而需要辅助手术。

结果

在这7例弹簧圈栓塞后接受手术的病例中,4例能够夹闭残留瘤颈;3例因弹簧圈部分填充瘤颈而无法夹闭。在这3例中,对残留瘤颈进行结扎并对瘤囊进行凝固处理。

讨论

讨论了弹簧圈栓塞后残留动脉瘤治疗的困难以及除夹闭术之外的其他手术技术(残留瘤囊包裹或凝固)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验