Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries.
作者信息
Darmoni Stefan J, Roussel Francis, Benichou Jacques, Thirion Benoit, Pinhas Nicole
机构信息
Computer and Networks Department, Rouen Medical School, France.
出版信息
J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):323-7.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reading factor: a new bibliometric criterion for managing digital libraries.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Jul;90(3):323-7.
2
Reading factor: a bibliometric tool to manage a virtual library.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):385-9.
3
The importance of small research projects: the impact of full text online journals on journal use surveys.
Natl Netw. 2003 Apr;27(4):5-7.
4
Journal usage in a children's hospital library.
Hosp Libr. 1980 Summer;5(2):44.
5
Online use statistics.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2002 Spring;21(1):25-33. doi: 10.1300/J115v21n01_02.
6
A changing landscape.
PLoS Biol. 2003 Dec;1(3):E89. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0000089. Epub 2003 Dec 22.
7
Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):223-8.
8
A review of electronic journal acquisition, management, and use in health sciences libraries.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Jan;94(1):67-74.
9
Access to electronic health knowledge in five countries in Africa: a descriptive study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 17;7:72. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-72.
10
Notion of "virtual library" developing as medical schools cope with rising journal costs.
CMAJ. 1996 Apr 15;154(8):1261-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Journal impact factor: holy grail?
Neth Heart J. 2012 Oct;20(10):385-6. doi: 10.1007/s12471-012-0317-3.
2
A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures.
PLoS One. 2009 Jun 29;4(6):e6022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
本文引用的文献
1
Cost effectiveness of a medical digital library.
Med Inform Internet Med. 2001 Oct-Dec;26(4):325-30. doi: 10.1080/14639230110097824.
2
Measurements of journal use: an analysis of the correlations between three methods.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1999 Jan;87(1):20-5.
3
[The impact factor: a critical analysis].
Rofo. 1998 Sep;169(3):220-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1015082.
4
The journal "impact factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure.
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998 Jul 15;104(2):77-81. doi: 10.1016/s0165-4608(97)00459-7.
5
[The "impact factor" and the impact of medical journals].
Rev Med Chil. 1998 Feb;126(2):135-8.
6
[Factor impact and indexing in bibliographic databases: comparison of these quality criteria for the assessment of pharmaceutical journals].
J Pharm Belg. 1998 Mar-Apr;53(2):71-3; discussion 73-80.
7
The relationship between journal use in a medical library and citation use.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1998 Jan;86(1):31-9.
8
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497.
9
Information retrieval in digital libraries: bringing search to the net.
Science. 1997 Jan 17;275(5298):327-34. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5298.327.
10
How can impact factors be improved?
BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):411-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.411.
Zotero 插件