Smith Helen, Bukirwa Hasifa, Mukasa Oscar, Snell Paul, Adeh-Nsoh Sylvester, Mbuyita Selemani, Honorati Masanja, Orji Bright, Garner Paul
International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 May 17;7:72. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-72.
Access to medical literature in developing countries is helped by open access publishing and initiatives to allow free access to subscription only journals. The effectiveness of these initiatives in Africa has not been assessed. This study describes awareness, reported use and factors influencing use of on-line medical literature via free access initiatives.
Descriptive study in four teaching hospitals in Cameroon, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda plus one externally funded research institution in The Gambia. Survey with postgraduate doctors and research scientists to determine Internet access patterns, reported awareness of on-line medical information and free access initiatives; semi structured interviews with a sub-sample of survey participants to explore factors influencing use.
In the four African teaching hospitals, 70% of the 305 postgraduate doctors reported textbooks as their main source of information; 66% had used the Internet for health information in the last week. In two hospitals, Internet cafés were the main Internet access point. For researchers at the externally-funded research institution, electronic resources were their main source, and almost all had used the Internet in the last week. Across all 333 respondents, 90% had heard of PubMed, 78% of BMJ on line, 49% the Cochrane Library, 47% HINARI, and 19% BioMedCentral. HINARI use correlates with accessing the Internet on computers located in institutions. Qualitative data suggested there are difficulties logging into HINARI and that sometimes it is librarians that limit access to passwords.
Text books remain an important resource for postgraduate doctors in training. Internet use is common, but awareness of free-access initiatives is limited. HINARI and other initiatives could be more effective with strong institutional endorsement and management to promote and ensure access.
开放获取出版以及允许免费获取订阅期刊的举措有助于发展中国家获取医学文献。这些举措在非洲的成效尚未得到评估。本研究描述了通过免费获取举措对在线医学文献的知晓情况、报告的使用情况以及影响使用的因素。
在喀麦隆、尼日利亚、坦桑尼亚和乌干达的四家教学医院以及冈比亚的一个外部资助研究机构开展描述性研究。对研究生医生和科研人员进行调查,以确定互联网使用模式、报告的对在线医学信息和免费获取举措的知晓情况;对部分调查参与者进行半结构化访谈,以探究影响使用的因素。
在这四家非洲教学医院中,305名研究生医生中有70%报告称教科书是他们的主要信息来源;66%的人在过去一周使用过互联网获取健康信息。在两家医院,网吧是主要的互联网接入点。对于外部资助研究机构的研究人员而言,电子资源是他们的主要信息来源,几乎所有人在过去一周都使用过互联网。在所有333名受访者中,90%听说过PubMed,78%听说过《英国医学杂志》在线版,49%听说过考科蓝图书馆,47%听说过HINARI,19%听说过BioMedCentral。HINARI的使用与在机构内的计算机上访问互联网相关。定性数据表明登录HINARI存在困难,有时是图书馆员限制了密码访问。
教科书仍然是培训中研究生医生的重要资源。互联网使用很普遍,但对免费获取举措的知晓有限。HINARI和其他举措在获得机构有力支持和管理以促进并确保访问方面可能会更有效。